Leaving the note, to contemplate, that amirm now becomes one of the subjectivist reviewers himself, since he wants to start subjectivist headphone reviews mixed with a tiny bit of objective data (measurements).
Measuring only frequency response and distortion is not nearly enough to give a fair comparison of headphones.
Especially the notion to review and mix up different headphone drives types (dynamic, electrostatic, planar magnetic, air motion transformer, ribbon, tesla) is inherently wrong in itself, since head/earphones with different driver technology does not sound the same, even when the frequency graph is basically very similar.
You can crank up the lower frequencies of a sennheiser hd650 as much as you like. Besides from distorting very fast, it will never give the same punch in the lower frequencies, as the audeze lcd-2 does, a planar magnetic type.
There is also no "bad or good" response, no matter the targeting curve (harman or whatever).
Amirm can give as much recommendations and decapitated or golf playing panthers as he wants.
It is mainly subjective at this point, not enough measurements to justify the science in adiosciencereview.
The problem arises that just the recommendation by him/giving a panther, makes people believe that this headphone now is "not worth buying/or is", even if he writes "suvbjective review" in size 50 big and red letters.