Thanks for pointing this out
but even thought I was able to make a difference convenience is the main goal.
Plus I'm pretty confident to say that proper Atmos mixing will be a big step foward in quality and entertainment way much more than HiRes. I'm very excited Apple is pushing it. Hope other streaming services will do the same.
It would be a big step, if it was taken serious, accessible, and affordable.
It's why I doubt you'll ever see an indy Atmos album for example. Unless Dolby wants to continue making a mockery of their standards (which to be fair, all standards bodies these days forgot what a "standard" even means, or simply loosens restrictions or certification requirements). They can go the route of MQA and simply put out some fallacious "auto encoder for smaller independents" and offer an algo driven Atoms mix by sending in your music to a Dolby facility (publisher/encoding facility or whatever) of some sort. But that would just be a disaster.
The problem with Atmos now, is they're trying to backport music that wasn't created with the software itself from inception of the music (starting in the recording studio). This is just a pure gamble and can never be reliably assumed to be better than an original mix.
They should try and salvage their image a bit and force labels and Apple to show if something was created with Atoms as the native mix of consideration. Their process is already shrouded in mystery enough of how it works. I haven't really seen any beyond the basic claims of virtualized channels in an emulated "box" of a room, which is somewhat silly really judging by the software graphical representation of what you're actually doing. Also, what mix am I getting, what mixes are available, how would a 7.1 (or higher) mix be represented with a binural fold-down considering each channel is customizable. You also have no idea (similar to MQA) what version of software they use, since there's no possible way all of what Atmos is currently from a software version perspective, will somehow remain also that way in the future.
I just have trouble understanding how they make claims that a single Atmos mix scales up to a movie theater's worth of speakers, all the way down to stereo listening devices.. And the fact that not all of the Apple Music Atmos music I've listened to sounds even remotely close to the basic original mix (let alone better), leaves me scratching my head just at what Dolby thinks they're offering here. Just seems like a modernized version of virtual surround, that would work great if you natively recorded for surround (lots of room mics and the whole jazz), but if you don't, then how could it possibly make sense.
Dolby pulled this nonsense with Dolby Vision. Allowing such certification on just awful displays nowhere near capable of displaying HDR in any appreciable sense of the word. I could go on with garbage moves like first saying dynamic metadata support needs to be hardware built, but then pulling back on the claim after a while and started offering a simple update that is now somehow capable of going from static to a dynamic metadata support. Just ridiculous.