Vacceo
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2022
- Messages
- 3,045
- Likes
- 3,233
The conclusions of Spinoza should lead you to think that even the relative scarcity of knowledge in both data and natural principles was no deterrent to realize how small the margin of choice is for a human being. On that regard, Spinoza had an indeed surprising conception of the divine: it exists, but it has no thelos because there is no final aim. The divine, for him, is the very connection of causes and effects.Spinoza and pre XX+ century philosophers didn't have access to genetics/epigenetics, thereby rendering a subjective perspective, rather than Sapolsky's objective/scientific conclusions. Until I started to read the current literature, I was firmly in the self-determination camp, much like before ASR I believed in all kinds of subjective audio myths that didn't adhere to the laws of physics and engineering. Degrasse Tyson quoted that 93% of post doctoral scientists do not believe in god isn't the surprise. The surprise is the 7% who do, "god of the gaps". From my casual observation, it seems like this is a similar ratio as to those that believe in self-determination. This surprised me, since I would have thought that all those individual smarty pants particle physicists et. al., would think that their accomplishments were the result of their own decisions and "gumption". Self-determination/free will, seems to share a dwindling number of adherents with those holding religious beliefs. I'd be interested in your opinion as a professor with a concentration in mythology and compared religions.
Myths dilute deep fears into a larger ocean of certainties taken a priori. The fact that we are self-aware comes with a massive myriad of fears: death, irrelevance, knowing your contingency as part of larger systems, lack of purpose... There are a multitude of answers for those fears and myth is, in a sense, a balm to ease the anxiety caused by the realization of the nihil. We create myths, inevitably, because our language is based on symbolization, and thus, it permeates to our cognition and volition. However, that cognition and volition is part of a larger system (the reality we live in) and includes a lot of smaller sytems (our biological functions).
We, in the end, create "noble lies" (as Plato would put it) to provide a meaning, however arbitrary it is, because that helps our functioning systems to actually function.
It tries to "save" a religious figure, or at least contextualize it in a way that tries to be respectful with the faithful. It adds nothing particularly novel, but it´s not a bad text. If you want to go hard to the bone, try Marvin Harris´ "Secret of the Prince of Peace".Do you have a historian's opinion on Resa Aslan's book "Zealot" with the caveat that it's a work for popular consumption and not a peer reviewed paper?
View attachment 406451