i just got in a pair of these and the bose qc earbuds II last week and am baking them off against each other. first impressions are that the bose have a _much_ better seal, as they have a seal both on the ear canal and the outer ear. experience in the office with ANC is that the QC EB II beat out my wh-1000XM4, across the board, but were especially more effective at higher frequencies (!). just got the airpods on friday so haven't been in the office with them yet, but i suspect they won't beat the QC II ANC.
my rough tonal impressions are that the new airpods are much more neutral than the old airpods, while the QC II have a boosted low end. i'm not exactly doing critical listening on a pair of bluetooth earbuds with ANC on, so i appreciate the low end of the bose. however, i expect that when crinacle's airpod measurements hit autoeq, that could change. crinacle notably has not been measuring the bose qc earbuds.
the seller for me for bt earbuds with portability and ANC (although I am considering custom IEMs for the office, the wireless and built-in mic are much more convenient, so if I can find some wireless that approach the same isolation, i likely won't bother..)
my rough tonal impressions are that the new airpods are much more neutral than the old airpods, while the QC II have a boosted low end. i'm not exactly doing critical listening on a pair of bluetooth earbuds with ANC on, so i appreciate the low end of the bose. however, i expect that when crinacle's airpod measurements hit autoeq, that could change. crinacle notably has not been measuring the bose qc earbuds.
the seller for me for bt earbuds with portability and ANC (although I am considering custom IEMs for the office, the wireless and built-in mic are much more convenient, so if I can find some wireless that approach the same isolation, i likely won't bother..)