Nope. Exactly the same deal. So don't try to play some woke gender card- it just doesn't work with people who have independent and critical thinking skills.
I loved teenage boy music, when I was a teenager. Think Wham!, Culture Club, Duran Duran, Spandau Ballet, Nik Kershaw, Howard Jones and for the girls; Irene Cara, Madonna, Cyndi Lauper etc. It was fabulous. It still is when I want a retrospective jaunt into my adolescence. Throw in a bit of Quiet Riot, Midnight Oil and you have an 80s party. Yay.
But listening to current tweenager pop now in my fifties would be just, plain, weird. Creepy in fact. I grew up. Have you?
You're not doing it right. If you want to offend the pleb, just say the truth: it's an insipid fad with little musical worth bolstered by potent marketing and anyone who treats it as anything more than pleasant radio music has garbage taste; and like all these pop music fads, it'll fade like snow in the spring sun, won't even have the time to miss it.
An advantage of not being natively anglophone, is that you focus on the music first, then on songwriting last, so you can't really make the mistake of confusing music for poetry: text is a bonus of least importance, that is given much interest mostly in today's popular music by people who want to feel/appear deep.
I can understand audiophiles liking its ultra close-miced sound and pulsating electronic bass, but the content? Heh. That's for the kind of "audiophile" that "listen to everything" which is
always a codeword for "I only listen to approachable stuff and I don't have an independently developed aesthetic sense".
At that point, you wait for the inevitable answers full of the usual fallacious accusations (*ist, old man, narrow mindedness, "not bowing to the Relativism god", etc...). While you sit smugly for 5 minutes before forgetting it anyway.