So how do you explain these sound stage differences?
I don't. I'm only conveying my own subjective experience. I would love to go through the AES archives and do a proper literature review of perceived sound quality vs measured performance. I think that would be insightful. In fact, that's one of the reasons why I became an AES member. If you can recommend any research papers on this topic I'm certainly open to your recommendations. I figured I'd start with Olive & Toole and go from there.
Or is this again something that can't be measured and at the same time also a clever selling tactic with links to your shop?
I don't know if it can or cannot be measured (hence the need for the literature review). If it is a clever sales tactic, then it'll be the first time in history that I've had one of those. Should I take your notion of it as a compliment?
I provide more measurements and data for my products than anyone else in the industry, so if you're a hardcore objectivist you should be able to find the data you need on the product pages. If not, you're always welcome to suggest additional measurements. If you do so, I would appreciate it if you also explained why you would like me to add the suggested measurement.
I used to be more of a hardcore objectivist and was somewhat dismissive of subjective experiences as "biased" or "non-scientific". But more recently - I think following one of our exchanges here - I've become more open to the subjective experiences. After all, my customers are humans and they don't live in a science experiment. All of their interactions with the products will be sighted. I think it would be naive to ignore that. Just as I think it would be naive to ignore the measurements. Maybe I'm a professional fence sitter.
I apologize if I spoke too empathically earlier. I'm passionate about audio and my business.
Tom