weasels
Senior Member
There's plenty of new music that I don't connect with, but I assume that the issue is on my side as a consumer, not that the quality of music itself has changed significantly over time.
I read an article years back that was talking about the affect the internet has on music.
Different sounds used to develop in different parts of the country and then when they got good enough they'd suddenly appear on the radio in the rest of the country. We'd end up with the New Jersey sound, a completely different type of pop out of Miami, something unique from Seattle and on and on suddenly getting a lot of airtime. Before the bands from those areas hit it big it wasn't likely the rest of the population would hear them so the bands and aspiring singers from the other areas wouldn't have been influenced by that sound and would continue to work on their own. Now everyone hears everything from everywhere so we rarely get vastly different sounds coming to market at the same time. If breathy vocals are in then that is all we get and most on youtube emulate that.
The people that really dig into what is out there can find some unique sounds but they rarely develop to a level that hits the big market.
I understand that it's better than it sounds.True, I have been trying to get into Wagner and Richard Strauss for 50 years. I know they are excellent but...
I mean Pearl JamWhen you guys refer to "PJ," do you mean PJ Harvey? If so, is that how Brits refer to her? I.e., is she big enough in England that everyone knows who you're talking about w.out mentioning last name?
Asking cause I'm in the USA. She is not universally known here; not a big star. Confirming this is fact that she I don't think she's toured in the US since 2017, although I vaguely recall she did a date in Brooklyn in Summer 2019. She can fill mid-sized venues in hipper cities, sorta like when Bryan Ferry tours here. Nevertheless, she does have a substantial and very passionate following, myself included, who not only like her work but view her as a important and serious artist.
Anyway, I hope I'm not revealing myself as an old guy and you're really referring to some autotune act of whom I'm unfamiliar. BTW, I'm a late Boomer, so one generational cohort older than her typical fan. Anyway, she is awesome and I am enjoying the release of demo versions of all her albums.
FIFYThere is two kinds of music, thegoodmusic I like, and thebadstuff I don't. I play what I enjoy.
How do you know that? You don't think Zeppelin or The Who wanted to make money?Yes, now music is made for profit, rather than from passion & talent.
It always has been, but it is the talented who make the money from Bach to EilishYes, now music is made for profit, rather than from passion & talent.
Sorry, but this is so not true.Yes, now music is made for profit, rather than from passion & talent.
Well almost...
I can't help but feel that older music is just is so much better than all the new stuff being released today in all music genres.
There isn't one modern rock band that even comes close to Radiohead, Nirvana, PJ etc..
No artist that comes close to MJ
No new Bob Dylan, no new Jeff Buckley etc...
Well you get my point.
All new music and artists are just mediocre at best, except in some rare cases (Joanna Newsom, Regina spektor)
Does anyone here feels the same way?
Talented in music or marketing, ideally both.It always has been, but it is the talented who make the money from Bach to Eilish
Well almost...
I can't help but feel that older music is just is so much better than all the new stuff being released today in all music genres.
There isn't one modern rock band that even comes close to Radiohead, Nirvana, PJ etc..
No artist that comes close to MJ
No new Bob Dylan, no new Jeff Buckley etc...
Well you get my point.
All new music and artists are just mediocre at best, except in some rare cases (Joanna Newsom, Regina spektor)
Does anyone here feels the same way?
Bach was a throwback, he didn't get the gigs got Telemann as Bach's music was considered too old fashioned. Bach is such a freakin' miracle, really talented, really productive, didn't come up with much crap, genius of polyphony, not particularly successful in his own time but successful enough to produce a really large body of first rate work.I can only imagine people alive during Mozart's time..
"To hell with this present day garbage, bring back the Gregorian Hymns!"
The access to global music sources and genres is a great point. There is so much more from every country now at our fingertips, and the cross influence is greater than ever. I think it's hard to know where to start in order to discover what you like. Like we need better personalization in music services to cue up novel music that appeals to our tastes.It sure changed back from when there was no internet, less regional I guess, but there is still typical 'sounds' coming from different countries. Even in black-metal, a genre mostly known for harsh guitar sounds, evil imagery and crappy production, there are different recognisable sounds from different countries. It really is not very different than the scenes that gave us Pink Floyd, King Crimson and Genesis... They all play progressive rock, but sound pretty different.
Typical. Nobody appreciates an artist until they are dead.Bach was a throwback, he didn't get the gigs got Telemann as Bach's music was considered too old fashioned. Bach is such a freakin' miracle, really talented, really productive, didn't come up with much crap, genius of polyphony, not particularly successful in his own time but successful enough to produce a really large body of first rate work.
Nobody appreciates me now, so this must be the truth.Typical. Nobody appreciates an artist until they are dead.
How do you know that? You don't think Zeppelin or The Who wanted to make money?