It matters when you use the ADC for measurements. Many DACs have a flatter passband response than these AKM ADCs.
So for the product's intended usage of recording and playing back audio, no perceptible difference. Gotcha.
It matters when you use the ADC for measurements. Many DACs have a flatter passband response than these AKM ADCs.
Actually, it was Amir who mentioned about the ripples:So for the product's intended usage of recording and playing back audio, no perceptible difference. Gotcha.
But does it matter in reality?
He measured the THD of the SSL 2 (10 ohm output impedance) at 32 ohm load and it was bad, like the focusrite 3d which has an output impedance of 0.35 ohm.That's not what I gathered, he said the SSL2 sucks at <80ohm headphones due to high distortion.
He measured the THD of the SSL 2 (10 ohm output impedance) at 32 ohm load and it was bad, like the focusrite 3d which has an output impedance of 0.35 ohm.
There is also the Steinberg ur22C with a ~90 ohm output impedance which performs equally good at 32 and 300 ohm load, but with a lower power though.
So we have 2 counter examples of the simple relation input/output impedance regarding headphone amps.
The SSL 2 has a monitor output of 1 ohm and could potentially be used for headphone i guess ?
Sorry probably out of Motu m2 topic.
If i understand right the Motu M2 specs, the monitor ouputs are not truely balanced. Is it important ? Maybe measurements with the RCA outputs would be interesting.
That's what I'm trying to tell you dude, a lot of people cannot interpret the raw data! These numbers are completely meaningless unless you understand the technicals behind them, which most will not; they require interpretation unless you want them to be useless for the majority. Even Amir does basic interpretations of data in his reviews so people can understand the gist of what he is presenting.
I cannot see how this is a hard concept to grasp. We already had someone in this thread saying they couldn't read them.
No.Yes there are many graphs, i am very well mathematically inclined and still they are very challenging for me since I do not know what to compare with what, but from what i gather from comments here is if we use this as a dac on low gain setting and being measured from its own adc this should be close to the green DACs this forums graphs since the sinad should be like 110db ? Am i close?
Well, since it's loopback measurement, they are implicitely tested, but only at their lowest gain. One could imagine setting the output low enough to avoid clipping the input when increasing input gain, but I fear that all that would be shown is amplified output noise. An attenuator would be needed to avois this, mine is broken right now.Any tests of mic preamps ?
I bought the M2 for some debug and EOL testing.
Amongst the "cheap" interfaces, it was the one that seemed to have the lowest noise. I didn't really care about distortion since for accurate work, I plan to use an harmonic cancellation software.
As written, something was fishy with the first set of measurements, once I re-measured, the two had close performance.Difference between TRS1 & TRS2 - it's broken device or schematic bug ?
- OpAmp TI 88 1AW7 (didn't find anything on Google)
I think, it's TI 88 1AW7 = TI opa1678 , low-cost OpAmp ($0.29 for large quantities).
Because OPA1678 in some case size's marked as AW7, see datasheet.
How much power M2 use from USB-C / power bank , when it recorded signal from XLR Mic ports with phantom power?
Anyone tried use M2 with Android USB Audio Recorder Pro ?
The power bank I use is a cheap one, very small, 4000mAh and usually I record with a pair of phantom powered Clippy XLR Omni microphones.
Well, I was not able to discharge the battery after 4 hours of recordings.