What an obscene amount of money for this stuff.
What an obscene amount of money for this stuff.
Speaking of tube amps because tube amp is part of the solution in that video. As I see it, tube amps have their place among DIY enthusiasts who have technical knowledge and find it fun and satisfying to tinker with tube amp building projects.
'Obviously'? Ugh no. Crooks and scammers have no issue taking advantage of ignorant and gullible people. You assuming that they believe their own bullshit is a great way to get scammed.Well that is true but Audio Note conducts their own tests with their equipment - and they use some of the best measuring and test equipment available - they have concluded that certain wires and caps transformers make an improvement which is why for example you can audition an M3 and M5 an M6 and an M8 preamp - all of them are the exact same design topology in the exact same case with the same features - the only difference is the internal parts. You can audition these identically designed amps to determine if all those "parts upgrades" are audible or not. Obviously, they feel they are and so do the people spending the money for them. This is the same for the AN E/LX speaker that uses Copper while the AN E/SPe uses silver cable. The price difference is relatively small and one can choose what they like better or what they think is better value - or if you want pit them against each other level matched and blind to see if you can even tell the difference. Peter Qvortrup has always been happy to put his gear in blind-level matched conditions. After all - when so many people see the measurements and "corner loaded" and see that they are wider baffle - a lot of expectation bias goes against them.
From the review'Obviously'? Ugh no. Crooks and scammers have no issue taking advantage of ignorant and gullible people. You assuming that they believe their own bullshit is a great way to get scammed.
Case in point: https://www.audionote.co.uk/isis-mains
https://www.dagogo.com/audio-note-uk-isis-mains-cable-review/
Price: 437.63 USD first meter,
233.88 USD per additional meter;
554,47 USD for 1.5 meter.
View attachment 365803
'Obviously'? Ugh no. Crooks and scammers have no issue taking advantage of ignorant and gullible people. You assuming that they believe their own bullshit is a great way to get scammed.
Case in point: https://www.audionote.co.uk/isis-mains
https://www.dagogo.com/audio-note-uk-isis-mains-cable-review/
Price: 437.63 USD first meter,
233.88 USD per additional meter;
554,47 USD for 1.5 meter.
View attachment 365803
From the review
“This cable benefits from at least a hundred hours of break-in and when you first plug it in will require some additional settling time, which is to say that it does not like to be moved or plugged and unplugged.”
From the review
“This cable benefits from at least a hundred hours of break-in and when you first plug it in will require some additional settling time, which is to say that it does not like to be moved or plugged and unplugged.”
I weigh ~70kg and can produce about 150 watts of power for a reasonable while, what will they pay for me? Admittedly I lack firm control of the mids.45kg and 20 watts - that’s half a watt per kilo
I’m happy we all we make you smile.I’m new here as a commenter, but have found the common mentality amusing.
It’s nuts isn’t it !That kind of stuff makes me want to slam my head through the table.
Sounds like you enjoy your current system more than the luxury hifi component that you say measures better. You’re using your ears! Nice.I’m happy we all we make you smile.
I use an AVR with Dirac that subjectively in my room sounds as at least as good as the luxury HiFi product it replaced which had a price tag 5 x higher. The measurements of the HiFi product were a little better, but not audible in my room. Dirac and well measuring speakers made the difference, not 5N silver cables, or tubes or 45kg casework, or hand wound transformers or any other amount of this stuff
I’m glad you like AN, but the laugh is on you not us .
Edit - the idea that poorly measuring gear that colours the sound to taste is a superior pov is nuts.. how can it colour the sound the right way for every piece you play - it’s a fixed tone control - an expensive one at that .
I have listened to AN gear, many times. Including one system with the Ongaku featured in the post above. I still dismissed it.I’m new here as a commenter, but have found the common mentality amusing.
People should listen to a piece of gear before dismissing it based on measurements.
You did what I recommended everyone do! Listen! Sounds like listening to the gear has helped you find what you do and don’t like.I have listened to AN gear, many times. Including one system with the Ongaku featured in the post above. I still dismissed it.
yes it is personal taste, but please don't assume none of us have auditioned this stuff. I've been doing this for forty years, I've heard it all.
Sounds like you enjoy your current system more than the luxury hifi component that you say measures better. You’re using your ears! Nice.
But then you missed this:I hope measurement obsessed “objectivists” don’t have turntables. Or enjoy recordings made with microphones and compressors and mic preamps that objectively measure “poorly” but are used to make our favorite and classic albums.
I do find it interesting that “objectivists” can find the charm in an inherently flawed medium, but maybe that’s one of the many exceptions to the rule. Vinyl on a properly set up turntable of good quality does sound lovely, but the dynamic range measurements, distortion, and channel separation are objectively poor.But then you missed this:
Turntables, Phono Amplifier, Cartridges Review
Review, measurements and discussions of LP formataudiosciencereview.com
Here you see the "objectivists' own record player:
Nice turntables. Attached picture is an absolute requirement.
Post a picture of a vinyl lathe that you think looks good.:D Performance information, optional. I am most interested in some nice pictures. How vinyl sounds is of secondary importance. For me anyway.:) Feel free to tell us about your youth's vinyl player. Take a trip down memory lane...audiosciencereview.com
Many switch between streaming and record players. Nothing strange about that. Turntables have their charm, which is not in their sound quality compared to streaming.
In addition, if you just want the best sound quality, you wouldn't be able to listen to old recordings made with yesterday's technology, but many people listen to these old recordings in spirit, even objectivists.
But what objectivists do NOT do, for example, is buy extremely expensive snake oil cables. It adds nothing. It's just throwing the money in the lake.
I’m glad you enjoy how your hifi reproduces music!You misunderstand my point, but I suspect there is little point in continuing this. This conversation has been had many times before.
I can colour the sound in any number of ways with EQ, but I can also be reassured that I’m starting from a place of relative neutrality as demonstrated by the measurements. The measurements also mean I stop wasting money by making choices based on a brain (not ears) that is fickle , inconsistent, easily fooled, gets tired, etc .
I am constantly exasperated by people who expose that audio is on some higher plane of understanding or an experiential level beyond engineering and science
Edit - whilst making coffee I realised that my HiFi is just another appliance in the house . It is an appliance that renders music . The hard work on that music is done by the composers musicians and studio team. I love music , it’s precious to me, for that reason alone I need the HiFi to be a non event . It’s a music rendering applicance bought to a price point and specification. Not very romantic, but there you go.
Thank God AN don’t make washing machines - they would probably only clean properly if situated in corners