• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Topping RD3 TP Balanced DAC Review

Rate this DAC:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 5 2.2%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 14 6.1%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 89 39.0%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 120 52.6%

  • Total voters
    228

Sokel

Master Contributor
Joined
Sep 8, 2021
Messages
6,259
Likes
6,390
Nor can I. :)

No worries, however that part wasn't directed at you anyway. I must say regardless of audibility, it's not good to see that level anyway on the toslink input.


JSmith
I would be nice if @amirm was opening this,one for the tech-porn and two to see if there's something wrong in there.
I mean,as @Rja4000 posted on first page they do advertise Ultra low jitter for all inputs.
 

CleanSound

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 30, 2023
Messages
1,654
Likes
2,517
Rack mount doesn't have to be like that. Can look tidy and aesthetically pleasing:


https://dedupelist.com/
Pleasing in a space like this? OK, if you were still living in the 70's, sure.

(Not my space BTW)

035479fae4fe4a3b861fb3b0361dc557.jpg
 
Last edited:

Atanasi

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
718
Likes
798
Since this is a forum that deals with objective measurements and tries to avoid using flowery terminology when describing the subjective auditory experience, shouldn’t the same apply when it comes to visual and tactile experience of a product?
The UI of a product could be evaluated scientifically, but it is a different kind of science than measuring audio products. For example, digital volume controllers should have some acceleration so that the user can more easily make both small and large changes. However, the reviewers on this forum are probably not UI experts, so they could not make such evaluations based on science.
 

CleanSound

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 30, 2023
Messages
1,654
Likes
2,517
Well this is Topping's introductionary products to the pro market.

The RA3 is only 50ish WPC @ 8 ohms. (Before the knee. Which should be the responsible power rating.)

That is NO WHERE near pro audio territory. Not by a mile.

These Topping TP lines have some identity crisis for sure. What the hell is intended market and use case?
 
Last edited:
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,792
Likes
242,594
Location
Seattle Area
The UI of a product could be evaluated scientifically, but it is a different kind of science than measuring audio products. For example, digital volume controllers should have some acceleration so that the user can more easily make both small and large changes. However, the reviewers on this forum are probably not UI experts, so they could not make such evaluations based on science.
That is part of my expertise and as I have commented on the same interface before, it has very nice acceleration support. But you are right that I only hit on high level points and do not intend to cover full functionality of devices.
 

Atanasi

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
718
Likes
798
These Topping TP lines have some identity crisis for sure. What the hell is intended market and use case?
JohnYang1997's AMA thread had a few answers about the TP brand:
On the note of the TP branding. It's different from the professional that's happening in the future.
This TP branding is mostly larger sized products with insane performance to cost ratio.
TP: Larger size, remote volume is a must, lower cost solutions on the chassis, for slightly longer range use like in living room or listening room. Sold by topping directly.
 

Saponetto

Active Member
Joined
May 19, 2021
Messages
262
Likes
212
Location
Old Southern Italy
Like a lot this form factor, but I'm going to stay with my current DACs.
Nothing that made me going hyperdrive due it mainly looks like a slight commercial misstep.
Maybe it's the "empty box" fear, dunno. :confused:
 

manisandher

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Messages
656
Likes
614
Location
Royal Leamington Spa, UK
... rack mount used to indicate high-end audio. It is not meant to look like a pro product.

Surely you meant:

"... rack mount used to indicate pro audio. It is not meant to look like a high-end audio product."

Mani.
 

Haskil

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 29, 2019
Messages
335
Likes
590
Location
Gisors, Normandie, France
-120db is roughly the threshold for the average human. For some people it may be higher or lower. This DAC shows jitter peaks as low as -100db.
So I wouldn't say it is absolutely inaudible for everyone.
I participated in an ABX amplifier test that I couldn't even start because I was unable to recognize the two compared amplifiers in non-blind listening...

At the end of this test, we have used the QSC device for carrying out tests in ABX to try to see what the perceptible level of jitter was: it contains an adjustable jitter generator...

We were four rather seasoned listeners and none of us was able to hear what the defect brought by the jitter sounded like... Until the moment when we heard it very well because the DAC simply stalled...
 

restorer-john

Grand Contributor
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
12,812
Likes
39,269
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
I participated in an ABX amplifier test that I couldn't even start because I was unable to recognize the two compared amplifiers in non-blind listening...

At the end of this test, we have used the QSC device for carrying out tests in ABX to try to see what the perceptible level of jitter was: it contains an adjustable jitter generator...

We were four rather seasoned listeners and none of us was able to hear what the defect brought by the jitter sounded like... Until the moment when we heard it very well because the DAC simply stalled...

What are you talking about? :facepalm:
 

Transmaniacon

Active Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2020
Messages
181
Likes
151
I never realized how much discussion could be had over the aesthetics of a budget DAC… if you don’t like the look, it’s not for you.
 

restorer-john

Grand Contributor
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
12,812
Likes
39,269
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
I never realized how much discussion could be had over the aesthetics of a budget DAC… if you don’t like the look, it’s not for you.

Aesthetics were brought up by Amir. “The unit sports a gorgeous, white segmented display with highly responsive control. It is a joy to use”

To me, and many others, it looks cheap, nasty and not remotely ’gorgeous’, no matter if it was free or sent to me gratis…

It looks like something I would have made in the 1980s in a 1U rackmount case and desperately tried to convince myself it was decent. Luckily I moved on to real HiFi.
 

Ajax

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
259
Likes
831
Location
Byron Bay, Australia
Thanks…nice form factor and I hope I am correct in saying that the rca output can be use for a subwoofer, which if true is a wonderful feature all for 229…
That is how I have my set up - an SMSL SU8 DAC with the XLR going to a Buckeye hypex amp driving a pair of B&W speakers, and the RCA to a Velodyne sub, so that both the mains and sub receive a full range signal. I set the sub's crossover (low pass filter) to 60hz and adjust the volume via a remote to suit the music I'm listening to ensuring that it "blends" well with the mains.

Most probably to simple for many here but it works great.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom