benanders
Senior Member
Is there a relationship between LF driver size and soundstage size?
If so, what is the nature of the relationship?
D (Direct relationship)
I (Inverse relationship)
F (Flawed-by-design reasoning to this query)
I brought this up in another thread (maybe not-so-relevant there on second thought), and resubmit here in survey form based on communicated interest from another member.
It’s been suggested here and elsewhere that LF is particularly important in how we perceive soundstage size/width/etc.
If there’s accuracy to that, we should be particularly considerate of woofer size in the sub(s) we choose, if there’s also a relationship between driver size and soundstage size.
Is there a relationship? And if so, are we choosing LF driver size(s) accordingly
Thanks for considering.
If so, what is the nature of the relationship?
D (Direct relationship)
I (Inverse relationship)
F (Flawed-by-design reasoning to this query)
I brought this up in another thread (maybe not-so-relevant there on second thought), and resubmit here in survey form based on communicated interest from another member.
(I typed “negative relationship”; I should have typed “inverse relationship” …)I’ve been curious for some time about a purported negative relationship
between driver size and soundstage: smaller drivers generating a more expansive soundstage, as it relates to LF.
The flip side of this would be the argument of lower visceral impact from multiple small drivers of equal surface area to a large driver(s), again for LF.
Seems relevant enough with things veering towards subwoofers.
It’s been suggested here and elsewhere that LF is particularly important in how we perceive soundstage size/width/etc.
If there’s accuracy to that, we should be particularly considerate of woofer size in the sub(s) we choose, if there’s also a relationship between driver size and soundstage size.
Is there a relationship? And if so, are we choosing LF driver size(s) accordingly
Thanks for considering.