One last attempt. And please answer with a direct reply and not some indecipherable mumbo jumbo.Yes, exactly, not about what I hear. Or what you hear.
We need a member who are expert in PCM converter to debunk Miska measurements. Best using Miska approach to debunk himself.
Where are your RELEVANT measurements, test results, or peer reviewed papers?
Please direct me to your test results. ThnxI've posted quite a bunch of measurements and test results. If you think they are not relevant, it is your personal opinion.
I have no time nor interest in writing any papers.
@Miska is that worth paying 240 euro's for?
I am quite happy with PCM and can't hear the difference.
Please direct me to your test results. Thnx
Contradictory posts. Please resolve.
Post # 604:
Post # 620:
Thank you. Jim
I would think that it would be advantageous to your “business” to prove to the public what a great improvement in their listening pleasure your software and the science behind it provides. A short paper defining exactly what your program does, that could be reviewed by experts in the field, would be beneficial to your bottom line.I have no time nor interest in writing any papers.
I would think that it would be advantageous to your “business” to prove to the public what a great improvement in their listening pleasure your software and the science behind it provides. A short paper defining exactly what your program does, that could be reviewed by experts in the field, would be beneficial to your bottom line.
My google machine must be broken. There was not one objective test result. A lot of links to audiophilestyle and similar subjective reviews, but not a single actual objective test result. Please direct me to the tests I missed.You need to Google around for that
My google machine must be broken. There was not one objective test result. A lot of links to audiophilestyle and similar subjective reviews, but not a single actual objective test result. Please direct me to the tests I missed.
C’mon, throw me a bone and point me to just one objective test result of hqplayer. Please.I guess none of the measurement results I've posted on this thread count as such either
C’mon, throw me a bone and point me to just one objective test result of hqplayer. Please.
Miska has posted measurements on a few forums over the past many years.My google machine must be broken. There was not one objective test result. A lot of links to audiophilestyle and similar subjective reviews, but not a single actual objective test result. Please direct me to the tests I missed.
Oh, I fully understand their architecture. Just because there is noise shaping in majority of ADCs does not mean at all that they equal DSD64 1-bit encoding. Easy to prove. Here is RME ADI-2 Pro FS being fed a 1 kHz tone at 96 kHz sampling:Except that all your beloved ADCs and DACs that give out and take in PCM do precisely that outrageous noise shaping in their internal DSP. And you pretend that it doesn't exist.
You better learn about modern converter architecture first.
His audience must not have the most basic knowledge of signal processing/converters to let him get away with the nonsense he is posting here. That he is prolific is a given.Miska has posted measurements on a few forums over the past many years.
Like he said, you need to look around.
Even various threads on ASR.
Join those threads and ask questions and others with the time can answer.
He is debunked left and right. But if you can't follow the argument, I can see you not getting that.We need a member who are expert in PCM converter to debunk Miska measurements. Best using Miska approach to debunk himself.