Is that why you keep saying stuff that's either demonstrably wrong or has no evidence supporting it?I don't have any measuring instrument.
Is that why you keep saying stuff that's either demonstrably wrong or has no evidence supporting it?I don't have any measuring instrument.
That looks like a minim phase square wave. But that's not on speakers I think you can zip audio files if you want to attach them.I don't have any measuring instrument. I can't even open the glued sealed cabinet to access it amp circuit This website doesn't support upload of wav files. Orelse I can give this. Output of Serum soft synth plug in.
Ok. Take note, it goes very loud. Can make you go crazy if you keep repeating it. It is very short wave life. Edit them if you need to do.That looks like a minim phase square wave. But that's not on speakers I think you can zip audio files if you want to attach them.
So this is what that looks like on an actual speaker:Ok. Take note, it goes very loud. Can make you go crazy if you keep repeating it. It is very short wave life. Edit them if you need to do.
I dunno why you talk about speaker when it is all about the amp. Speaker output is another issue too. There are two tone in the file just to take note. Open wave editor you can see the slight different visually. Even the tone itself have a bit different wave form due to Serum algorithm to make the tone sell, not for measurement.So this is what that looks like on an actual speaker:
View attachment 183904
LS50 with Dirac., so a coaxial. If you try this with a normal 2-way, it will look way worse.
Because speakers mess it up anyway, especially in the case of normal multiway systems.I dunno why you talk about speaker when it is all about the amp.
Class D square waves look just fine.Speaker output is another issue too. There are two tone in the file just to take note. Open wave editor you can see the slight different visually. Even the tone itself have a bit different wave form due to Serum algorithm to make the tone sell, not for measurement.
It is very fine. 460kHz wide bandwidth. Gryphon Class A on spec is 450kHz, you know the cost.Class D square waves look just fine.
No politer way to put this: that is absolutely nuts.I dunno why you talk about speaker when it is all about the amp.
I consider the non-audibility of distortion at low levels is moot despite the likes of ABX testing. Such testing being "science", but like all current science, not "settled", i.e. not necessarily ultimate truth.But as we've seen distortion on class A amps is not at audible levels even though it does not compare well to e.g Hypex or Neurochrome. Although I suppose it might be with a really badly implemented class A design but it would have to be shockingly bad.
As usual, we hear what we want to hear, or what we expect to hear. There's no escaping that.
It is very fine. 460kHz wide bandwidth. Gryphon Class A on spec is 450kHz, you know the cost.
What's the bandwidth of your DAC? speakers? Or your ears?It is very fine. 460kHz wide bandwidth. Gryphon Class A on spec is 450kHz, you know the cost.
Spectral amp. 1.8mHz +- 3dB but quite noisy amp for ASR standard. You got to listen what the highest bandwidth amplifier can do. Keith Johnson will want you listen with 2C3D setup thou. Listen it before goes into history. Don't need to own one.What's the fastest signal the amp will be fed when listening to music ?
For what would one need 450kHz power bandwidth ?
What will your speakers produce ?
Would that be a square-wave ? (Vinyl, tape or digital are all band limited so are recording microphones)
My speaker dunno. It is equator audio q8. The company go bust. DSP crossover goes mHz.What's the bandwidth of your DAC? speakers? Or your ears?
If you want to fill all of the 460 kHz bandwidth of a square wave, you'll need to generate it using at least a 920 kHz sample rate.
You don't understand. Your square wave will not use any of that bandwidth because it cannot contain any of the harmonics above the bandwidth of the sampled signal. You can have a 10 MHz amplifier all you want, if you generate a square wave with 44.1 kHz sampling, the highest harmonic will be at about half that at most, so 22 kHz. No amount of oversampling will change that.Spectral amp. 1.8mHz +- 3dB but quite noisy amp for ASR standard. You got to listen what the highest bandwidth amplifier can do. Keith Johnson will want you listen with 2C3D setup thou. Listen it before goes into history. Don't need to own one.
Speaker is speced to 22kHz -3dB, so that is all the bandwidth you'll ever need. I'm pretty sure the DSP will just run on 44.1 or 48 kHz given the age of these things. So no, they don't do mHz..My speaker dunno. It is equator audio q8. The company go bust. DSP crossover goes mHz.
Spectral amp. 1.8mHz +- 3dB but quite noisy amp for ASR standard. You got to listen what the highest bandwidth amplifier can do. Keith Johnson will want you listen with 2C3D setup thou. Listen it before goes into history. Don't need to own one.
You don't understand. Your square wave will not use any of that bandwidth because it cannot contain any of the harmonics above the bandwidth of the sampled signal. You can have a 10 MHz amplifier all you want, if you generate a square wave with 44.1 kHz sampling, the highest harmonic will be at about half that at most, so 22 kHz. No amount of oversampling will change that.
All you need to listen to 2C3D setup. Nothing much to say if you don't listen. Keith Johnson already opened the door of wide bandwidth. Look at this look just fine again. The transistor actually switching into 1.2mHz and no more reading. It is 500 times more bandwidth than you need in audio.You probably mean 1.8M(ega)Hz instead of m(illi)Hz
Why does one have to listen to an amp with the highest BW it can do ?
What would be the difference between an amp BW limited to 100kHz or 1.8MHz when it never gets fed anything above 50kHz.
In fact, depending on the DAC one uses a high BW can give lots of problems.
Uh huh.All you need to listen to 2C3D setup. Nothing much to say if you don't listen. Keith Johnson already opened the door of wide bandwidth. Look at this look just fine again. The transistor actually switching into 1.2mHz and no more reading. It is 500 times more bandwidth than you need in audio.
This is typical of Spectral amp.
SPECIFICATIONS
DMA-250 S3 Stereo Reference Amplifier
Power Output:
(continuous)
Output Current:
- @ 8 ohms - 200 Watts RMS
@ 4 ohms - 360 Watts RMS
@ 2 ohms - 545 Watts RMS
Frequency Response:
- 60 Amps peak per channel
Distortion:
- ±0.1 dB, DC-150 KHz
±1 dB, DC-1 MHz
±3 dB, DC-1.8 MHz
Static:
Dynamic:
- Less than 0.015% from DC to 100 KHz, typically 0.005% @ 200 WRMS/8 ohms
Speed:
- 8 Tone Cluster Test 20 KHz @ 500 Hz separation; 0.01% 8 ohms; 0.015% 4 ohms
Rise Time:
Settling:
- Less than 400 nanoseconds
Slew Rate:
- 1.5 microseconds to -40dB
Noise:
- 600 volts/microsecond
Signal to Noise:
Crosstalk:
- 97dB
Input:
- -102dB @ full power 8 ohms
Impedence:
Sensitivity:
- 10K ohms
Power Supply:
- 1.5 volts / nominal output
Line Voltage:
AC Voltage Range:
- 100 volts, 120 volts, 240 volts (factory set)
Maximum Consumption:
- ±10%
Quiescent Consumption:
- 1600 Watts
Operating Temp:
- 250 Watts
Protection Features:
- 0° to 50° Celsius range; 32° to 122° Fahrenheit
DC Protection Servo:
Current Limit Onset:
- 0.5 volt range
Thermal Threshold:
- 40 Amps
AC Main Fuses:
- Protects at 85° Celsius, 185° Fahrenheit
Size and Weight:
- 2 @ 2.5A 3AG Slo-Blo for 100 - 120 VAC
Dimensions:
Weight:
- 19" (48.22cm) W
7 1/4" (18.4cm) H
18" (45.8cm) D
- 64 lbs, (29.0 KG) Net
Warranty
3 Years Parts and Labor
Lot of the spec are worst than AHB2 other than Frequency Respond and speed. It is one of the top well engineered amp in the world. If really choosing for reference, I will definitely choose Spectral.
Any real measurements instead of a spec sheet typed up by the manufacturer? Would be interested to see same.Spectral amp
No one test the amp, but this forum has these info:Any real measurements instead of a spec sheet typed up by the manufacturer? Would be interested to see same.
JSmith