lherrm
Active Member
I didn't imply they have to sound bad because they don't measure flat. Probably they can sound great.yeah because they sound awesome, so if you don't see it you won't know how bad they are
I didn't imply they have to sound bad because they don't measure flat. Probably they can sound great.yeah because they sound awesome, so if you don't see it you won't know how bad they are
You can hear how bad they are at every store that sells them. I still remember when I heard the KEF 207 Reference next to a pair of B&W 800 series. It was not even close. At that point B&W still was one of the premier loudspeaker manufacturers in my mind and it was a real shock when I heard how much better the KEF's were. Imagine that, being so bad that your badness completely obliterates all positive mind share you had prior to the session.yeah because they sound awesome, so if you don't see it you won't know how bad they are
That's not the point.What speaker company doesn't use marketing lol
I would say mainly the mic or the wrong equalisation used at the recording, although the 805 D4 has some elevated highs it does not sound like that bad by far.Was it the room acoustics, microphone, recording, or speakers?
I mean I don't want to create more aggravation in this thread but came across this youtube video of B&W 805 D4.
This was sibilance galore! Unlistenable even with my Sennheiser HD660. I can't imagine how would this sound with some Focal headphones. Not sure what went wrong here. Was it the room acoustics, microphone, recording, or speakers? The setup looks to be a top-notch audiophile dream. Speakers are pulled away in the room and the only thing that is missing is the cable raisers.
Agree, I should've checked the original recording first.It sounds super sibilant as a recording (performance?) when I listen on YouTube with headphones.
Interesting that the D3 is tuned quite flatter.801D4 in German Audio mag.
View attachment 171722
800D3 also from Audio for comparison.
View attachment 171733
Yep. For some reason they are moving into the direction of UN-listenable. See my post above.Interesting that the D3 is tuned quite flatter.
Actually I hear how incredibly good they are almost every day since I own the 800 D3sYou can hear how bad they are at every store that sells them. I still remember when I heard the KEF 207 Reference next to a pair of B&W 800 series. It was not even close. At that point B&W still was one of the premier loudspeaker manufacturers in my mind and it was a real shock when I heard how much better the KEF's were. Imagine that, being so bad that your badness completely obliterates all positive mind share you had prior to the session.
That's not the point.
What a rollercoaster, crazy how it makes the 800D3 on-axis looks good. Off-axis is garbage for both of course, so your in room response is going to be a total cluster fuck.801D4 in German Audio mag.
View attachment 171722
800D3 also from Audio for comparison.
View attachment 171733
I read that review and he seemed to like them no? He also said he toured the B&W factory and believes the speaker measures how B&W wants it to.804D4 on Stereophile Jan/22 issue. Quite impressive port resonances for a 12.5k usd pair of speakers. At least JA was fair in criticizing them.
View attachment 172292
The tonal balance yes, but the ports resonances are of course not deliberate.I read that review and he seemed to like them no? He also said he toured the B&W factory and believes the speaker measures how B&W wants it to.
And this is supposed to be the most uber ultra reference? Sure…804D4 on Stereophile Jan/22 issue. Quite impressive port resonances for a 12.5k usd pair of speakers. At least JA was fair in criticizing them.
View attachment 172292
When you see that kind of response…it’s evident that JA opinion is a paid one, a factory tour only add up to the reasoning. Justifying that as an intended “design choice” (port resonance)…cmon.I read that review and he seemed to like them no? He also said he toured the B&W factory and believes the speaker measures how B&W wants it to.
The fact remains that the speaker is how B&W wants it to be at least as far as the FRAnd this is supposed to be the most uber ultra reference? Sure…
When you see that kind of response…it’s evident that JA opinion is a paid one, a factory tour only add up to the reasoning. Justifying that as an intended “design choice” (port resonance)…cmon.