A dog whistle? I think they crack 30kHz...Maybe this thread can be ended with a rather simple answer: How high can Instruments go?
Is there any instrument in any music culture on earth that produces a frequency spectrum up to 20.000hz?
Maybe this thread can be ended with a rather simple answer: How high can Instruments go?
Is there any instrument in any music culture on earth that produces a frequency spectrum up to 20.000hz?
My installation is set up in line with Bob Katz' system and it's effective.@eboy
If you want what I think is a sensible method of mastering using compression without ruining the results read and think about the following articles.
Bob Katz K-system.
Another variation on the same ideas:
![]()
Level Practices (Part 2) - Digido.com
Digital Domain - we ensure musicians, independent artists and record labels get the best sound possible. Bob Katz provides the best in mastering and mixing.www.digido.com
If you have questions after looking this over, ask them.
Awaited this Joke already Does anyone has Gyöti Legitis‘ „Atmospheres“ at hand? Do not find my copy right now,A dog whistle? I think they crack 30kHz...
But based on dogs' reactions, they'd describe the treble as "harsh" :-D
Because someone will buy it for a premium.
And your belief is what makes it sound better to you. Fascinating how the mind works.I believe a remaster based on this should sound better than previous masters https://www.plangentprocesses.com/
It's probably worth reading the AES paper to understand the science behind this. A lot of "new improved mastering processes" are bunk or questionable, but this process does solve a generally accepted and well known problem with mastering (and using a tape made on machine A on machine B).And your belief is what makes it sound better to you. Fascinating how the mind works
That is interesting, looks like they use it as a way of timekeeping when coming from analog because tapes aren't perfect. So its benefits are not in the frequency domain, but the time domain.It's probably worth reading the AES paper to understand the science behind this. A lot of "new improved mastering processes" are bunk or questionable, but this process does solve a generally accepted and well known problem with mastering (and using a tape made on machine A on machine B).
Exactly. In my day I did a lot of work on studio-quality professional 2", 1/2" and 1/4" tape machines. We could get the wow and flutter into a good tolerance but not eliminate it. The worst case would be a tape on machine A, played back on machine B where both were at opposite tolerances. There are measurable downsides to getting this wrong. The AES paper allows the wow and flutter of Machine A to be detected and corrected for. I can't think of a reason why you wouldn't want to to do this!That is interesting, looks like they use it as a way of timekeeping when coming from analog because tapes aren't perfect. So its benefits are not in the frequency domain, but the time domain
Weirdly, the second Comfortably Numb guitar solo seems to be recorded differently. There's also something very odd involving mirroring/imaging around a 34kHz pivot! This below in the lump from 27kHz to 34kHz and then 34kHz to 41kHz.Comfortably Numb 192kHz at 24bit. Everything above 46kHz is noise, but frequencies below that pulse in time with the music. I've no idea what it sounds like, of course![]()
I complete agree, the so called HD version is worse than the CD version. They compressrf it make it sounds loader and perceived as better. It is not as outrageous as others, but it's definitely not better.Wrong. They don't remix. They take the original master and compress it some more. Thats about it. Theres only one guy I know off who remixes.
https://www.soundonsound.com/people/steven-wilson-remixing-classic-albums
He takes the multitracks and reproduces the mix. This is very complicated. Heres a part of the article.
This is a slow, painstakingly intense part of the process. "I start listening to 10, 15 seconds at a time, and it'll be 'Oh yeah, the guitar's muted for those first four bars of the second verse, so I need to do that in my session.' Then I'll listen to the next 10 seconds, and 'Ah, OK, there's a phaser been added to the hi-hat there.' And so on through each song."
Completely different than a remaster. Remasters are often a sham and can be made by adding a bit of EQ. There often worse sounding than the original, IMHO not far from snake oil.
Remixes can sound better. Listen to some of Steve's.
Maybe this thread can be ended with a rather simple answer: How high can Instruments go?
Is there any instrument in any music culture on earth that produces a frequency spectrum up to 20.000hz?