• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

What is with this AI Image Look?

I disagree. Would any man prefer looking at or watching a movie with women with appearance deficits if there are better looking women available?

Would the James Bond movies have been as good or popular if they only included ugly women?

The audience for beautiful women is very close to including all hetero males.

I’d rather watch a movie with a woman who could act,

Probably not, but they are “of a time”, thankfully societal norms are evolving but unfortunately many of the species are still playing catch-up

And this is not to be admired
 
Prompt: a cute american woman, with brown hair in a red business outfit standing in an office holding a tablet computer

1730167673461.png
 
Probably not, but they are “of a time”, thankfully societal norms are evolving but unfortunately many of the species are still playing catch-up

And this is not to be admired

Are you saying we should evolve to prefer seeing less attractive women? That is ridiculous.
 
the cute and the red look very strange to me and I am not good at seeing fake images.
 
Last edited:
AI images tend to give "people" a wax museum quality.
 
"Here's the pencil you requested. Let me know if you need anything else!"
Amusing, but unsure what you used there as this one seems to be ok with that request;

1730175002458.png




JSmith
 
while this image really cries AI, the soft background is in photogarphy called bokeh and can be achieved by a hobby photographer with an appropriate lens and other settings.
I am well aware of photography technique. Here are some of my street photography using the same:
Harajuku bokeh 1.jpg


Harajuku bokeh 2.jpg

Harajuku bokeh 4a.jpg


The point was that you don't want every AI generate image to use this technique to the max which then becomes a give away that it is artificial. Variation needs to be there using other styles such as selective focus in this image:

Harajuku bokeh 3.jpg


Seems like someone has hard coded one style and it seems way too restrictive.
 
I think it tries too hard, sometimes.

"draw a pencil"

View attachment 402339

"Here's the pencil you requested. Let me know if you need anything else or have another idea in mind."


"No, just draw a pencil"

View attachment 402341

"Here's a pencil for you. Let me know if there's anything else you need!"


"There is more than a pencil in that image. Try again."

View attachment 402343

"Here's a simpler image with just a pencil. Let me know if there's anything else you need!"


"Draw a pencil, but do not include a room, a window, a desk, coffee, a notebook, or an eraser."

View attachment 402347

"Here's the pencil you requested. Let me know if you need anything else!"
Post of the day. :D:D
 
Prompt: a cute american woman, with brown hair in a red business outfit standing in an office holding a tablet computer

View attachment 402381
Hands screwed up again. (Or at least, hand)

I find it fascinating that AI is uneversally struggling with hands. It seems to be able to create perfect faces - which is odd, because we are particularly sensitive to deviations from reality in the face.

But hands - it can't do.
 
Seems like everywhere I turn, people are using AI generated images of people. How do I know? They all have this look:

Totem-Newsletter-Image-16.webp


Same bronzy, very warm look with that diffused background that doesn't look like a camera lens. Foreground is also aways sharp. An AI detection site says the above is from MidJourney. Maybe those always have the same look?

Regardless, it is getting way too obvious and tiring to look at. Above is from Totem website by the way. I routinely see thumbnails in youtube generated the same way.
Looks like a analog look.
 
Back
Top Bottom