dougi
Addicted to Fun and Learning
I'm about to go back to a MM cart. The lowest capacitance interconnects I have are some short Kimber PBJs which are unshielded tri-braid. I have used them for 10 years and never suffered any apparent issues due to induced interference. My alternative is some Project connect-it Es which has capacitance probably too high for MM (130pF for the length). That cable is a twisted pair, with shield, shield connected to -ve only at the pre-amp intended end.
You see all sorts of comments saying you must use shielded cable between the turntable and the phono pre. Why? Doesn't twisted pair (or tri) mean interference is largely common mode which will be largely rejected by the differential op amp or whatever in the phono pre input? Chassis grounds are always handled by the separate turntable to phono pre ground wire to deal with the separate ground loop issues.
Is a shield at all beneficial if using twisted pair/tri interconnects? It will be connected to the same -ve pins in the phono pre-amp and hence any interference on the shield will still be present on the -ve won't it? That -ve shouldn't be connected to the chassis ground as that would create a ground loop.
I am missing something?
You see all sorts of comments saying you must use shielded cable between the turntable and the phono pre. Why? Doesn't twisted pair (or tri) mean interference is largely common mode which will be largely rejected by the differential op amp or whatever in the phono pre input? Chassis grounds are always handled by the separate turntable to phono pre ground wire to deal with the separate ground loop issues.
Is a shield at all beneficial if using twisted pair/tri interconnects? It will be connected to the same -ve pins in the phono pre-amp and hence any interference on the shield will still be present on the -ve won't it? That -ve shouldn't be connected to the chassis ground as that would create a ground loop.
I am missing something?