- Thread Starter
- #41
I am pretty sure NASA is not the agency that deal with climate change. Nevertheless it has been my experience the government tends to deny such iissues less the be forced to develop an expensive and controversial solution.
They also prefer to not stir up the lunatic fringe.
...Popper recognizes that scientists can and do hold onto theories in the face of failed predictions when there are no predictively superior rivals to turn to. He holds that scientific practice is characterized by its continual effort to test theories against experience and make revisions based on the outcomes of these tests. By contrast, theories that are permanently immunized from falsification by the introduction of untestable ad hoc hypotheses can no longer be classified as scientific.
Yes reality bites. It really is bothersome to have an hypothesis confirmed by reality. At least if you cling to the belief that it can't possibly be true.The talk ofglobal warmingclimate change reminds me of this:
Is that a general rule, or just in this thread?Let's not discuss global warming guys.
Is that a general rule, or just in this thread?
I ask, because it's one of those subjects where one's opinion on some science is taken to be a proxy for one's politics - and this stifling of free speech fascinates me, drawing me in like a moth to aflamehigh efficiency LED lamp. A topic for Fight Club?
That's human nature though..Hi
It is very bad all around the World.. We focus on what is near meanwhile ..
In Asia 1000 died in Floods