Hi all and sorry for my english, I use google translator.
I am looking to upgrade an old hi-fi tower and would like to hear others opinions on what would be best for my situation. It should be a setup that I will use 90% of the time for TV sound, the rest of the time for radio or music.
My living room is 3.5x4 meters, with the TV wall located at the edge of the room. The place for the TV is given, and I can place the sound system either in the niche above it or in a smaller niche below it. If it was supposed to be a soundbar, it could be placed in the large niche under the TV. The dimensions of the large upper niche are 1300(width)x460(height)x500(depth). The height of the ceiling is 2350. I know that the placement of the speakers is not ideal, but unfortunately it is not possible otherwise or elsewhere due to space.
So now the options I'm researching:
A- Soundbar with subwoofer (Samsung HW-Q800C, etc.) - At first I preferred this option from the point of view of not a very suitable location for classic speakers, but in the end, since I live in an apartment, I don't know whether to get a subwoofer at all.
B- Active speakers or studio monitors (Edifier S2000MKIII, Kali MM-6) - This played about a level better than a soundbar when the speakers were placed correctly. But will it play a level better even if I place the speakers in a niche up to a height of 1.8 m? I would turn the speakers down so they point towards the sofa.The difference between Kali and Edifier is about £100. Do you think the Kali will play that much better to be worth the extra money over the Edifier? But Kali has a higher bass reflex in the front, which is more suitable for placement in a niche.
C - Mini amplifier + passive speakers (Fosi Audio BT20A Pro + Elac debut b5.2) - This set would cost about the same compared to the Kali MM-6, but will it be qualitatively worse or better? I don't know how this would work exactly as Fosi probably doesn't have a remote. With this variant, how would I deal with the fact that if I sit in front of the TV and want to increase the sound, so that I don't have to get up and turn the knob on the amplifier?
Which way did you go? Or are there any better options or components? I started thinking about the second and third options because I'm used to (as far as possible) slightly better sound and I don't know if a rattle with a subwoofer that will have to be slightly muted most of the time would satisfy me. In my opinion, a better set-up, even if placed badly, should play better than a soundbar.
Thanks for any answers.
I am looking to upgrade an old hi-fi tower and would like to hear others opinions on what would be best for my situation. It should be a setup that I will use 90% of the time for TV sound, the rest of the time for radio or music.
My living room is 3.5x4 meters, with the TV wall located at the edge of the room. The place for the TV is given, and I can place the sound system either in the niche above it or in a smaller niche below it. If it was supposed to be a soundbar, it could be placed in the large niche under the TV. The dimensions of the large upper niche are 1300(width)x460(height)x500(depth). The height of the ceiling is 2350. I know that the placement of the speakers is not ideal, but unfortunately it is not possible otherwise or elsewhere due to space.
So now the options I'm researching:
A- Soundbar with subwoofer (Samsung HW-Q800C, etc.) - At first I preferred this option from the point of view of not a very suitable location for classic speakers, but in the end, since I live in an apartment, I don't know whether to get a subwoofer at all.
B- Active speakers or studio monitors (Edifier S2000MKIII, Kali MM-6) - This played about a level better than a soundbar when the speakers were placed correctly. But will it play a level better even if I place the speakers in a niche up to a height of 1.8 m? I would turn the speakers down so they point towards the sofa.The difference between Kali and Edifier is about £100. Do you think the Kali will play that much better to be worth the extra money over the Edifier? But Kali has a higher bass reflex in the front, which is more suitable for placement in a niche.
C - Mini amplifier + passive speakers (Fosi Audio BT20A Pro + Elac debut b5.2) - This set would cost about the same compared to the Kali MM-6, but will it be qualitatively worse or better? I don't know how this would work exactly as Fosi probably doesn't have a remote. With this variant, how would I deal with the fact that if I sit in front of the TV and want to increase the sound, so that I don't have to get up and turn the knob on the amplifier?
Which way did you go? Or are there any better options or components? I started thinking about the second and third options because I'm used to (as far as possible) slightly better sound and I don't know if a rattle with a subwoofer that will have to be slightly muted most of the time would satisfy me. In my opinion, a better set-up, even if placed badly, should play better than a soundbar.
Thanks for any answers.