Dacs/amplifiers do not have soundstage. Soundstage is the result of pinna interaction, frequency response and more importantly your mind/senses.Maybe a stupid question, on this thread : could anyone compare the soundstage RME ADI 2 DAC FS vs iBasso D16 Taipan ?
Thank you
Okay, I give an example : I own the iFi Audio micro iDSD Signature and RME ADI 2 DAC FS
Tested with many different headphones. With RME, the soundstage is absolutely amazing, compared with iFi Signature
From a review ( D16 Taipan )
Soundstage & Imaging:
Despite its portable size, the iBasso D16 Taipan offers a nearly desktop level of spaciousness within its soundstage presentation. Instruments are precisely positioned within a well-defined stereo image, creating a clear sense of separation and depth. The soundstage feels expansive and holographic, surpassing many portable DAC/Amplifiers on the market. This spaciousness enhances the overall listening experience, drawing you deeper into the music and creating a sense of immersion. Tracks with a wide soundstage, like classical compositions or orchestral pieces, benefit greatly from this presentation, allowing you to appreciate the full placement of instruments within the sonic landscape.
The only difference I know of is that when applying overall negative gain to offset any possible digital clipping that your EQ may cause, the WiiM does it fully in the digital domain, while the RME uses its AutoRef hybrid gain. In theory this may give you extra SNR compared to digital attenuation only.Apologies if this question is a bit silly.
I am using a wiim pro plus as a streamer connected to the rme adi-2 dac via coax.
When applying REW measurements I have tried both device's eqs and have the impression that (applying the same filters) the RME "improves" the sound in a significantly clearer way than the wiim.
Now I wonder if there is a difference in the PEQ quality or am I just biased and projecting on the sound something that is not there?
Has anyone had a similar experience?
I may be wrong too but I think applying eq in the rme may be louder too. It has acres of headroom so doesn't apply negative preamp. So if OP is adding any negative on the Wiim, rme doing the eq will be that amount louder. You may have explained the same thing differently.The only difference I know of is that when applying overall negative gain to offset any possible digital posso that your EQ may cause, the WiiM does it fully in the digital domain, while the RME used its AutoRef hybrid gain. In theory this may give you extra SNR compared to digital attenuation only.
Welcome to ASR. Read this post carefully and then you can understand how higher SINAD and PEQ alone is not enough to have better SNR in all volume ranges like the RME does.So now when topping finally released d90 iii discreet with PEQ, have anyone compared it with RME? Been waiting for DAC with PEQ for quite a while and now I'm puzzled as to what I should pick. Going to use it with adam t5v speakers.
I did a test with EQ and Loudness off, and compared to iFi Audio micro iDSD SignatureThat sound stage text is mostly imagination but there are reasons in an A/B test the RME ADI-2 DAC FS can sound much better than a standard DAC. If you have used the "Loudness" controls to tweak the sound the difference can be enormous. The beauty of the Loudness controls is you can be listening to your favorite music and add a bit of kick to the music even when listening at lower levels. Or if you have speakers/headphones that sound somewhat dull you can make them sharp and clear with a few adjustments.
You would need to verify EQ and Loudness are both OFF to properly compare the RME to a standard DAC, as with the Loudness controls turned on just the way you like them nothing else will beat it. You can call it Soundstage if you like. But to most it's the difference between an exciting music playback session and an adequate one.
I did a test with EQ and Loudness off, and compared to iFi Audio micro iDSD Signature
RME, even with EQ and Loudness off, blows away the iFi Audio micro iDSD Signature
It sounds much better, larger, I don't know how to explain it
"Simply". And just for $13 on top of that.simply need a Raspberry Pi4
No, I haven’t been warned. I’m a customer explaining what worked for me and included a link to the product website. Yes it happens to have a buy button, but it’s also the only place where I see any information on this."Simply". And just for $13 on top of that.
And haven't you already got warned for advertising this exact product?
Why crossposting then?No, I haven’t been warned. I’m a customer explaining what worked for me and included a link to the product website. Yes it happens to have a buy button, but it’s also the only place where I see any information on this.
Simply trying to share information I found very useful with RME owners where it’s most likely to be seen. Is there a problem with that?Why crossposting then?
Sounds like a reasonable approach to avoid the possible audible effects of the DAC filters when listening to sources with 44.1 and 48 kHz sample rates. Not that I would consider it necessary, though, and definitely would be satisfied by 2× upsampling.I’ve been using the SRC in Roon set to max power of 2 with smooth, linear phase filtering on my RME DAC. Any thoughts on pluses and minuses of this? Seems to sound very detailed and also very smooth.
Roon allows you to set the SRC individually for each source sample rate or simply max power of 2. So it was just easier to do the latter. Seems to work fine, no dropouts. 176/192 I’m sure would be more than enough. It also lets you choose linear or minimum phase, and precise or smooth. They all sound very similar. Not sure I can tell much differenceSounds like a reasonable approach to avoid the possible audible effects of the DAC filters when listening to sources with 44.1 and 48 kHz sample rates. Not that I would consider it necessary, though, and definitely would be satisfied by 2× upsampling.