• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required as is 20 years of participation in forums (not all true). Come here to have fun, be ready to be teased and not take online life too seriously. We now measure and review equipment for free! Click here for details.

Review and Measurements of Musical Fidelity V90 DAC

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
15,437
Likes
9,475
Location
Seattle Area
#1
This is a review and detailed measurements and comparison of Musical Fidelity V90-DAC against Topping D50. The unit is on kind loan from a member who has been patiently waiting for its review. :) The V90-DAC retails for $300 from what I can tell (it is sold through a dealer channel) so a bit more expensive than Topping at $250.

The V90-DAC is quite attractive and has a high-end feel to it despite the diminutive case:

Musical Fidelity V-90 DAC Review and Measurement.psd.jpg


There is a certain elegance to it that you don't normally find in this price category. Compared to it, the Topping looks decidedly industrial.

It comes with a nice little switching power supply no bigger than a USB phone charger.

From format support point of view, the V90-DAC trails the D50 by only supporting PCM up to 192 kHz and no DSD. The Topping goes up to 768 kHz and DSD512. And while the Topping has a volume control, the V90 has none.

Let's get into measurements and see how they do.

Measurements
Let's start with our Dashboard:
Musical Fidelity V-90 DAC Dashboard Measurement.png


We see a healthy 2.2 volt output which is 10% more than the nominal 2 volts I look for. So there should be no problem driving any pre-amp after it.

Clock accuracy is a bit off at 1.00006 kHz or 60 parts per million. Not an audible concern but something to note.

THD+N and hence SINAD is pretty variable between channels. Like to see those closer. Still, both are in very respectable range. I averaged the SINAD for the two channels and this is where it fits:

Audio DAC Sinad Comparions.png


It lands where it belongs: below state-of-the-art tier but solidly above the low tier on the right.

Looking at intermodulation distortion we get this:
Musical Fidelity V-90 DAC IMD Measurement.png


There is higher noise and distortion levels until we get to mid-level where the Topping suffers. But then it loses at the highest levels. So a mixed picture and a draw.

A draw is also what we get for THD versus frequency:

Musical Fidelity V-90 DAC THD+N compared to TOpping D50 Measurement.png


For some reason, one channel in the D50 decided to have more distortion than it normally has. To that end, those two channels are the same but the other beats the V90-DAC. Still, the difference is not something to worry about.

Another even match is jitter and noise:
Musical Fidelity V-90 DAC FFT compared to TOpping D50 Measurement.png


Both have a few spikes especially due to USB packet traffic on multiples of 1 kHz which state-of-the-art DACs don't have. Levels though are at -120 dB so absolutely inaudible.

Finally, everyone's favorite measurement, linearity:

Musical Fidelity V-90 DAC Linearity Measurement.png


Here, we see some variability in the output of V90-DAC that Topping does not have. I like to see less than 0.5 dB at -120 dB level and the V90-DAC exceeds that a bit. So a nod goes to Topping D50.

Conclusions
The Musical Fidelity V90-DAC is a beautifully executed small DAC. It exudes a feel of luxury that doesn't exist in products in this category/price. Design is competent with no glaring faults. All in all, I say it is a hair worse than Topping D50 but we are literally splitting hairs here.

So ultimately this comes down to the usefulness of more formats in Topping D50 and its lower price, versus the more elegant look of the Musical Fidelity V90-DAC. You pick. :)

-------------

As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

If you like this review, please consider donating funds for these types of hardware purchases using Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/audiosciencereview), or upgrading your membership here though Paypal (https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...eview-and-measurements.2164/page-3#post-59054).
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2017
Messages
77
Likes
22
#2
I feel numb after so many years seeing measurements of DACs (power amps' are much funnier, plus transducer performances), does topping release their dual es9038pro or not? might be the only new DA that excites me a little
 

Ron Texas

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
432
Likes
194
#4
I believe the V90 is a bit dated as it only offers inputs up to 96k on USB. It is a favorite at Stereophile. Conversion uses a Burr Brown 1795, a change from the usual ESS.
 
Last edited:

mindbomb

Active Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2017
Messages
276
Likes
130
#5
Another great review!

In the spdif vs usb thread, the musical fidelity vdac II was one of the few that maintained low jitter on both inputs. I was wondering if that is true for both the v90 and the d50.
 
Last edited:

restorer-john

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
1,103
Likes
1,269
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
#12
Frequency response measurement for the APx555 is trivial. Amir presents those plots regularly, so much so that they only really bear comment or attention if there is an issue.
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
40
Likes
69
Location
California
#13

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
15,437
Likes
9,475
Location
Seattle Area
#14
Top Bottom