It is 18 dB worse than Topping D50 which puts it around 90. The test was with my old analyzer and I was not computing the SINAD then.
Ok, old topic, new question : I offered a Yamaha R-N402D with a CD-S300 and a NS-SW300 sub along with a pair of Focal Aria 906 to my aunt. She mostly listens to CDs, but occasionally to Internet radios and TV sound.
Unlike the R-N803D tested by Amir, the 402 dos not feature a sub pre-out, its Hi-Z inputs are hooked up to the Speaker B terminals (means I'm driving the Focals full range and just want to fill the very-bottom end with the sub). I have a bump in the room at around 43 Hz, that is I created a new problem that wasn't really there before. Like most Yamys there is a High-Pass tone control at 50Hz, but it not surprisingly just deprives the sub of any juice....
In the digital domain, I use VST3 PEQ plugins in Audirvana to stream Qobuz to the 402, and I can hear a difference (no furniture resonance at higher volumes...), but since my aunt mostly listens to CDs, I was considering the 2*4 HD unit between the CD player and the CD input.
SINAD-Wise down the signal chain :
CD-S303 with its Burr-Brown DAC claims 96dB of Dynamic Range (unsubstantiated)
MiniDsp 2*4 HD 90dB "only", worse when used with analog-RCA ins (as measured by Amir)
Yamaha R-N803D CD input to speaker terminals in "non-CD Direct" is a mere 73dB low (the 402 Model does not have that CD-Direct function which could boost its SINAD closer to the 803 or WXA-50 92dB as measured by Amir).
1) So I guess it all makes sense in this "poor" context (using MiniDSP as a DAC) not losing much down the signal chain, while improving overall sound in the room, would you agree ?
2) Were I then to replace the 402 by an 803 (for the sake of simplicity), and then moving the MiniDSP 2*4HD between the pre-out and the Sub(s), would you agree that YPAO-RSC would do something for the MIDs and Lower Trebbles, while/then the MiniDSP 2*4HD RCA to RCA would not mess-up the Low-End ?
3) I tried to place my RME DAC between the CD player turned transport and the poorly performing 402 and actually heard differences in A/B/C testing (analog CD in; digital in using internal 402 DAC; and Line in from the RME). Was I victim of biases, or is it really so important to keep the incoming analog signal as pristine as possible, even though it is then messed-up by internal noises ?
4) Would you then recommend a straight-in/out DAC between CD and 803 just good enough for RedBook quality that would not be so ugly in this Yamy stack, and not so expensive as to no longer make any sense in this price range (no single component is more than a few hundred euros) ?
5) Would it actually make sense to replace the 402 by an 803 in the first/second place ? That YPAO-RSC installment doesn't do anything in bass management (unlike most recent Yamaha AVRs). Plus, unlike AVRs, you don't know what YPAO is really doing and can't tweak any PEQ on any screen/display (no better served with the pricey R-N2000A "only game in town"). Finally, as measured by Amir, you're no better while streaming to it SINAD-wise...
Anyway, I hope this discussion brings something useful to the table, another discussion would be why is there such a gap in Yamaha's receiver catalogue between the "bluetooth in" only R-S202D (349€) and the R-N2000A (3699€) - part shortages vs profit margins ?- and why the heck room correction/PEQ is a given in AVRs and a premium in Hi-Fi ?