Ok, now you've made an unwarranted, context-ignorant leap to score a point. Hey, it's the internet, it happens.
I 'threw shade' at a dated production fad Portishead employed on Dummy on thread about analog-sound plugins. I like Dummy just fine otherwise; it's a classic, I still play it.
Wholesale dismissal of an artist with a catalog as varied as Peter Gabriel's, or claiming that five seconds of new music is enough to make one throw it out a window in favor of the laughably overrated Boomer chestnut LA Woman, makes me question one's musical wits.
My post was tongue-in-cheek. I hoped obviously, by virtue of the emoji deployed and the next paragraph (not in your quote) where I say that In matters of taste, there can be no disputes. My comment that you should enjoy what you enjoy was entirely serious, however. I think @AdamG's 'flying out the window post' was also humour, not to be taken too seriously. I'll discuss the Portishead thing further in the other thread.
Of course I am actually in the camp that can't listen to Gabriel for long. My dad has played Genesis to help educate me—and I can see that is historically interesting—but I haven't liked or seen the merit in his solo material personally. Apart from a collab with Laurie Anderson, which he didn't actually spoil. Perhaps my own taste filtered through and coloured the tenor of my post too much.