Are you arguing that once the lacquer is made, that is then the source?Lol.
Are you arguing that once the lacquer is made, that is then the source?Lol.
By definition if it remastered, then the original master is no longer the source. Remastering should go back to the multi track recordings and remixes them. The "original" master will already be a downmixed version of those - so not used as the source.Isn’t that the case with all music? It only stands to reason that it’s from the original masters, even if it’s done over and digitally remastered 15 times, it’s originally from the original master source.
By the companies own wording and based on the description of their products being all analog, to say that they didn’t tell the whole truth
and nothing but the truth is an understatement. Supposedly no digital step, and what you’re saying adds a digital step.
The point is by their own claims it was supposed to be kept all analog, and that is why some people bought them.
Why you feel the need to defend them (when allegedly they’re not being forthcoming) I have no idea, but anyway carry-on I’m out.
Of course it is. However I've seen no evidence so far that Mofi ever claimed there wasn't a digital step in the end to end process.Are you arguing that once it is originally mastered then transferring it digitally then making the new records from the digital source isn’t considered a digital step?
It was you said you were going to bow out. - you seem to have failed. You are more than welcome to ignore my posts.I think you need to read their website, and I think you need to read one of their record jackets, and I really think you need to let it go because I made my point and so did you.
If I’m wrong I’m wrong, but nothings been proven yet that’s why if you go back and read my statements I said allegedly. I think if it was so cut and dry the way you’re stating, there would be no need for lawyers, but I’m thinking that this is going to be argued in a court of law, not in public opinion or online.
With all due respect please stop quoting me and dragging me back into this… thanks.
No, they lied that digitising is not part of the process!The source is the tape. Digitised as part of the processing. Source is still the tape.
You don't need to apologise to me. I'm being at least as argumentative.My apologies to other members and Tony, it was not my intention to argue. Being right or wrong doesn’t change the fact that I was wrong to argue.
You seem to be misunderstanding the word "source"No, they lied that digitising is not part of the process!
Second sentence in red, underlined:
"We do not use digital sources except in cases where the title's original master was digital itself".
A link to the actual video would be more useful (context, again, is everything)
How about this (sentences in red, underlined):
Or get 100% return of the money.that's one helpdesk email to one customer. THAT customer might have a claim that there was misrepresentation, but as evidence in a class action suit it is worthless. Reading through that complaint, it's on a really thin legal and factual basis. still Mofi may want to settle it. most likely outcome: the lawyers pocket a few million and the customers get a 20% off coupon.
the conspiracy? really?Continuing the conspiracy.
as long as they have to give back the vinyl, Mofi would probably take that in a heartbeat.Or get 100% return of the money.
You are turning your blind eye on this.You seem to be misunderstanding the word "source"
Where was the music sourced from?
From the original analogue master tape.
How did it get to your factory?
We made a high quality DSD recording from the source.
Why to give back? Let say customers broke the MoFi vinyl in anger, but they do keep the receipt of the buying the vinyl. That evidence is enough for verdict.as long as they have to give back the vinyl, Mofi would probably take that in a heartbeat.
You are turning your blind eye on this.
Contrary to your phantasy (bolded in your post) which, by the way, MoFi never said, they clearly stated this:
"We do not use digital sources except in cases where the title's original master was digital itself".
That DSD recording is the source for the next step. I used to work in the factory, so I totaly understand what the word "source" mean. You don't.
Or get 100% return of the money.