• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Little Big 18" Subwoofer Build

Aijan

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2021
Messages
46
Likes
159
I’ve been building subwoofers for years now, and I’ve always used car audio drivers. However, I recently started building speakers using pro-audio drivers, specifically mid-woofers and horn loaded compression drivers. I love how dynamic and clean-sounding these drivers are, so it was only natural that I decided to give pro-audio subwoofers a try.

I did some research on pro-audio subwoofer drivers with relatively low Fs (resonant frequency) and high Xmax (maximum linear cone excursion), and the Lavoce SAF184.03 stood out as a promising candidate. It features a beefy 4" voice coil and 1500W power handling. Some might scoff at the Lavoce’s 30 Hz Fs and 13 mm Xmax, but keep in mind that I plan to build multiple subwoofers in tiny sealed enclosures – at least by 18" subwoofer standards, so deep bass output likely won’t be an issue, and I’ll still be able to keep enclosure sizes in check.

I eventually settled on an enclosure design featuring generous 4" radius rounded corners even though I knew it would be somewhat challenging to make. Using 15 mm kerf-bent Baltic birch plywood not only keeps the enclosure weight in check but also is stronger than MDF, not to mention the wood grain looks very nice when stained a light color. The braces and baffle were made from 18 mm MDF.

I used a biscuit joiner to cut slots in the plywood. The two MDF braces are attached to the plywood using biscuits, essentially serving as the form around which the plywood was bent.

kerf_bent_plywood_glued_up.jpg


The braces also feature circular openings to support the heavy subwoofer motor, which probably weighs close to 15 kg (~33 lbs) by itself.

subwoofer_motor_brace.jpg


The front baffle and rear panel were painted black, and the birch plywood was stained white with a two-component oil. I lined the walls with polyfill sheets.

cabinet_stained_painted_and_lined_with_polyfill.jpg


I placed four pillows filled with polyfill inside to improve deep bass response. In total, I used about 1 lb of polyfill per cubic foot. The gross internal volume, before accounting for driver displacement, is approximately 3 cubic feet (~85 liters), which is about 25% smaller than the typical minimum enclosure size recommended for a standard 18" car/home audio subwoofer.

driver_and_cabinet.jpg


With the addition of polyfill, the subwoofer’s resonant frequency decreased from about 61 Hz to 56 Hz. The impedance curve reveals that inductance is well-controlled, allowing this subwoofer to be easily crossed over as high as 500 Hz. The nominal impedance is 8 ohms.

impedance_curve.png


The near-field frequency response indicates a roll off that’s less steep than the expected 12 dB/octave for a sealed enclosure, thanks to the driver’s strong motor. When placed along a wall in a typical sized room, the subwoofer should deliver flat frequency response down into the mid-twenties, especially after reducing the ample mid-bass output using EQ or an AVR’s room correction capabilities.

near_field_frequency_response.png


Finally, a complete build video is available below. Please let me know what you think.

 
Good job Aijan! :) Your DIY turned out really stylish. Even (within the subwoofer category) to be considered beautiful. :D

Small box and low bass. If we take Hoffman's Iron Law states that with any speaker system you can only have two of the three options below:

1) Small Size
2) High efficiency
3) Low bass

I see you're working on that by: When placed along a wall in a typical sized room, the subwoofer should deliver flat frequency response down into the mid-twenties, especially after reducing the ample mid-bass output using EQ or an AVR’s room correction capabilities.

Size "increases" or the wall provides acoustic bass boost. Plus you reduce output/sensitivity. That's where the Lavoce SAF184.03 is excellent, which has 1500W power handling. You have power to play with/"eat up", so to speak. That when you EQ so you get your low bass response that is.:)
 
Hi Aiijan Lavoce SAF184.03 in the box you say till 500hz and Above that a SB20FRPC30-8 its a 8" FR I like it in a 30 litre sealed box and since I am 54 years old cant hear above 13K so dont feel the need for a tweeter will this plan make sense

minIDSP 2x4Hd and 1 Hypex NC502MP stereo 500 Watts per side for the Lavoce's and another small Hypex 100 watts amp for 8' FR
I have 4 Peerless SLS-P830669 drivers too was thinking of 2 peerless per side but still considering if Lavoce will take it to another level. dont mind buying Lavoce

cheers
anand
 
Hi Aiijan Lavoce SAF184.03 in the box you say till 500hz and Above that a SB20FRPC30-8 its a 8" FR I like it in a 30 litre sealed box and since I am 54 years old cant hear above 13K so dont feel the need for a tweeter will this plan make sense

minIDSP 2x4Hd and 1 Hypex NC502MP stereo 500 Watts per side for the Lavoce's and another small Hypex 100 watts amp for 8' FR
I have 4 Peerless SLS-P830669 drivers too was thinking of 2 peerless per side but still considering if Lavoce will take it to another level. dont mind buying Lavoce

cheers
anand
A tip, check out @ppataki various projects with broadband /coax speaker drivers for inspiration and tests/measurements. He has even tested the one you are considering. Check here:


If you are going to have a crossover point at 500 Hz why not choose a smaller broadband driver? The advantage then is that it should, theoretically, have better on off axes response higher up in frequency. For example this classic:

Taking in account the high technical performance and very low cost, TC9FD18-08, in my opinion, is just incredible speaker!


Edit:
Plus if you set the crossover point to 500 Hz you don't need such a wide baffle for a TC9FD18-08 to test just mounting it on the baffle. If you would like an open baffle solution with it I don't know but you can always test.:)

Sorry if it got a little OT in your thread @Aijan
 
Last edited:
Do you have any in room measurements of this? What type of SPL can you expect after room gain?

I'm looking to do something similar. Was considering using a linkwitz transform on top, as lots of power handling is remaining.
 
Sorry, I don't have far-field in-room measurements. Room gain is highly room and placement dependent, so it's hard to say how much gain you will get in your room. You might want to read Josh Ricci's article on the topic at https://data-bass.com/articles/5cb5fb285389a80004c7e58a

As for the Linkwitz transform, please note that it takes only 500W to reach Xmax. This subwoofer can handle a lot of power, but at low frequencies, it may audibly distort if you feed it too much power.
 
Love the build. I'm wanting to build a sealed unit with the same lavoce driver and came across your thread.

Would you mind sharing measurements for the enclosure?
 
If you were to build again would you give it a larger volume? Wondering why it's less than 2ft cubed which seems to be where most sealed enclosures fall with an 18" driver
 
I think the 3 cubic feet (~85 liters) of gross internal volume I used is about right for this particular pro-audio driver. Less efficient 18" subwoofer drivers with higher Xmax usually need 4 cubic feet or more. It doesn't take much power to reach Xmax, so adding more volume doesn't really help in that department.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sfs
You have the freedom to choose between volume and efficiency, taking into account Vas and design of the room.
For example, top to bottom, 400-200-100-50 litres with the same PA 18" driver:
View attachment 501407
(this is 377 litres Vas driver)
How does excursion/power handling at the different sizes compare? I assume the larger boxes run out of excursion quicker, which means less power is needed to reach xmax. And surely this also affects the max spl?
 
How does excursion/power handling at the different sizes compare?
As shown in the picture above. Oops, I forgot to mention, I think it's obvious that all the curves are drawn at the same voltage (28 V, 100 W @ 8 Ohm).
You can take any simple simulator and model your drivers in the desired enclosure volume.
Disclaimer: the simulation above is not anechoic spherical; it's a zero radiation angle, which is closer to the actual transfer function of my setup in my room.
 
Last edited:
Just saw the thread and wanted to say very impressive!
 
Back
Top Bottom