That would be a waste of money.chord quest to replace
Really? So whats you guys high end of choice would you replace these utopias for . Say 30k rangeNo b&w please.
Kii 3 + BXTReally? So whats you guys high end of choice would you replace these utopias for . Say 30k range
Why the kh870 is Soo expensive? I am planning to build 2 18 inch subwoofer and they are going to Be much more powerful, does the kh870 have some advantages for the integration in the system ?Kii 3 + BXT
Dutch & Dutch 8c
Neumann KH420 + KH870
Genelec 8361 + W371
But first, get a bigger room + room treatment.
Any reason why they are all active and studio speakers ?Kii 3 + BXT
Dutch & Dutch 8c
Neumann KH420 + KH870
Genelec 8361 + W371
But first, get a bigger room + room treatment.
They are the best measuring and thus the most transparent, they are also full-range so you hear everything and they have built in PEQ to take room derived bass peaks.Any reason why they are all active and studio speakers ?
And that’s the ultimate goal? The transparency and full range that would give the most listening pleasure ? I’m intriguedThey are the best measuring and thus the most transparent, they are also full-range so you hear everything and they have built in PEQ to take room derived bass peaks.
Many ‘audiophile’ speakers are really pretty poor, but heavily marketed!
Keith
Bingo. You would use equalization and room correction to tune the sound to your taste. The speakers and the Rest of the components should faithfully reproduce everything and not color it.And that’s the ultimate goal? The transparency and full range that would give the most listening pleasure ? I’m intrigued
Sorry if daft question
Well judging from this, I chose rather OK (let’s say totally by random ;-)Actually, now I look at some measurements on the web (anechoic, without room effects) I'm pretty impressed:
View attachment 256848
Stereo: Produkt
www.stereo.de
Because active speakers are the way to go and these are some of the very best out there. These all will surpass your focals in many ways.Any reason why they are all active and studio speakers ?
I’m not convinced honestly (as I had few active low end and they sounded terrible so I’m biased). But will look to test this.Because active speakers are the way to go and these are some of the very best out there. These all will surpass your focals in many ways.
Going active also means you will be cutting out a lot of the voodoo bs in this business, the bs of magically matching different components and “synergy” when driving passive speakers.
You cannot compare the mentioned speakers to the low cost ones like jbl 305/308 etc.I’m not convinced honestly (as I had few active low end and they sounded terrible so I’m biased). But will look to test this.
Later after I know the room layout that sounds the best . Also I don’t know the positioning of the woofers (if they are to stand between the speakers or in obscure places in room) and hence don’t know how much space I have between the speakers.You will get a massive improvement if you buy a TV stand, some bookcases and a thick rug.
I deliberately didn’t add anything as I’m learning (and asking) how to do this best. Lots of knowledge to process before I’m comfortable buying diffusers and absorbers . Getting that rug though!Above the Schroeder frequency you probably need some damping to reduce the bathroom effect of your barren room.
Wouldn’t setting the woofer to work below 44hz only solve that partially or do I need to use that woofers higher frequencies ? Because as far as I know I can set svs to work with 44 and lower and my speakers are working 44hz and up?The best way to do that is probably to use two or three smallish subwoofers and dsp room eq. your amplifier has a variable line level output to drive subwoofers, but I see no way to use a high pass filter for the main speakers, which is unfortunate. This is a problem with many integrated amplifiers.