- Joined
- Oct 25, 2019
- Messages
- 11,115
- Likes
- 14,782
Yes, I don't believe he re measures after eq. I may be wrong on that.Looks like the delta between measured and target response to me. Which is probably what he means by "compensated".
Yes, I don't believe he re measures after eq. I may be wrong on that.Looks like the delta between measured and target response to me. Which is probably what he means by "compensated".
Matter of opinion.4K for headphones is of course pretty crazy...
Every headphone I’ve heard from Focal has has had some degree of truly beautiful “magic”, and when coupled with their treble and upper mid attenuation, this camouflaging gorgeous sonic beauty kept them from being universally able to be used for professional work.Yes, ivagree with that.
After a long journey, i ended up back at the Utopia.
For these money, you expect magic,
and you get it!
I also had the Clear MG here.
This is also damn good...
Re the Stax and your impressions that it doesn't emphasise "S" sounds enough you might want to try adding in a broad Peak Filter at around 7kHz, say Q1.2 (I looked in REW and think Q1.2 would be quite optimal), and then increase the dB on the filter whilst listening to your vocals to see if you can solve the lack of resolution in that area. It's quite possible that unit to unit variation could mean that your Stax is not delivering the same frequency response that Oratory has listed on his site, so you could try to make the Stax sound better with that filter I mentioned. It's quite possible that the only reason you like the Focal more than the Stax in this area is because the frequency responses are different even though they're EQ'd to the same curve from Oratory measurements.View attachment 181016
A few hours of listening later:
First of all, looks and touch quality.
The Utopia clearly has the edge here.
If I spend 4000 € on a headphone,
i expect to be able to feel and see that in some way.
That is given with the Focal, not with the Stax.
Before i come to my sound impressions,
i must mention again that both KH are set according to Oratory's EQ settings (Harman target).
Without this, the 009, would be completely unusable for me.
Very bright, strongly mid-emphasized, and extremely low bass.
So I would describe the 009
"stock" describe.
In other words: my personal nightmare.
Adjusted according to Harmann, both headphones are on par.
Both are a hi-fi revelation in my opinion.
The Stax completely stress-free, extremely high-resolution, and indescribably musical.
The Focal equally stress-free, incredibly dynamic and energetic, and almost as finely resolving.
The biggest surprise for me was that the Utopia showed the 009 what to do with female and male voices.
These sounded more harmonious, more present, more engaged, and above all more emotional on the Utopia.
In addition, the Utopia has a better "grip" on S-sounds.
The decisive factor for me is ultimately which HP can convey more emotion,
and there the Utopia is my personal winner.
Whether Mark Knopfler or Xavier Naidoo, they "had" more feeling on the Utopia.
But as I said, actually, both are on par.
View attachment 181017
Each track brings new insights.
The trumpet on track #3 sounds sharp (almost squeaky) and unnatural on the 009, despite EQ.
Quite different on the Utopia.
Here it sounds much more natural, balanced, with a pound more substance.
I don't think it would be related to "technical capabilities", with headphones & speakers mostly you really only have frequency response & distortion with frequency response being the most important. Ah, you don't have the Stax 009 anymore then?I rather had the impression,
that this was a basic character issue,
or let's say rather that the technical capabilities of the 009s,
would be the limiting factor to reproduce "s" sounds.
Likewise with the trumpet of the track in question.
Highlighting these points, the Utopia is in my opinion, more Hi-Fi.
Nevertheless, the 009s has its charms.
However, I would never buy it.
Because the build quality is an outrage in my opinion....
Everything rattles and wobbles...
Each 100€ AKG, or Beyerdynamic feels much more valuable.
Yeah, cool, no problem. I mean it's hard to tune headphones by ear, and it's not my go-to method, I use measurements like you did with Oratory - just I had the idea of the "S" problem you mentioned.....after spending some time listening to music and viewing the dancing of the spectrum analyser you can see which frequencies you might want to adjust to tweak some areas when you've identified the frequency response area that the sound deficiency is coming from. Unit to unit variance is a real thing, that's been brought home to me by owning two units of K702 and also two units of HD560s, whilst also seeing the measurements of these model of headphones in terms of unit to unit variation.No, I only had it here for a few days.
Has anybody answered your question? I'm guessing the clear will sound VERY similar after proper EQ...After EQ, significantly different to the Clear? Or similar sounding but none of the driver issues?
Put another way, should a cash rich Clear fan think about these? Or not enough difference to bother?
I did test them both side by side. The clear OG has a really good tonality even without EQ and I find it to be a very well rounded headphone, particularly at their price point. Still the difference with the Utopia is easily noticeable, they are way faster with more precise imaging and better overall resolution. Soundstage is meh in both cases, like with all Focals. Clear OG have better value, but if you just want the best go with the Utopia.Has anybody answered your question? I'm guessing the clear will sound VERY similar after proper EQ...
They said they improved the sound at that link you gave. Do you know what they changed in the frequency response or elsewhere? They didn't seem to say, although I only gave it a quick skim.Focal just announced a revamped version
https://www.focal.com/en/headphones-0/headphones/for-home/utopia-2022
They said they improved the sound at that link you gave. Do you know what they changed in the frequency response or elsewhere? They didn't seem to say, although I only gave it a quick skim.