let me repeat:At least for me at 68 yo, I find that flat response still sounds the most natural. I have full PEQ available for my active speakers, but whenever I set the treble "by ear", it ends up flat, maybe with a tiny downwards roll (1dB at 10kHz) starting at 6kHz. I can only surmise my brain has already EQd my hearing as it changes.
Not me. I have always from a young age boosted the treble. Nothing much has changed other than my age is a lot older than before.At least for me at 68 yo, I find that flat response still sounds the most natural. I have full PEQ available for my active speakers, but whenever I set the treble "by ear", it ends up flat, maybe with a tiny downwards roll (1dB at 10kHz) starting at 6kHz. I can only surmise my brain has already EQd my hearing as it changes.
It would seem I'm verifying your statement (?)let me repeat:
"Note that this the increase of the hearing threshold and not the level loss at each sound level!"
indeedIt would seem I'm verifying your statement (?)
At least for me at 68 yo, I find that flat response still sounds the most natural.
Aha! I've never been good at hearing conversations in reflective environments, but it has worsened considerably. Still haven't gone to less dense music, though.Age-related hearing loss affects not only the higher frequencies but also the ability to suppress the reflex sound. The precedence effect diminishes with age. It becomes increasingly difficult to hear conversations in larger groups. Best compensated by reducing the reflexes. A higher proportion of direct sound is most easily obtained by listening closer to the speakers.
Another problem with age-related hearing loss is a reduced ability to distinguish words/music in dense flow. Less dense music is often an unconscious choice.