Uh huh.Ironically, it's arrogance like yours that is precisely why Harman Kardon is about to have a class action lawsuit slap them in the face. My ears aren't lying.
Ironically, it's arrogance like yours that is precisely why Harman Kardon is about to have a class action lawsuit slap them in the face. My ears aren't lying.
I can't speak for your ears, but something sure is.Ironically, it's arrogance like yours that is precisely why Harman Kardon is about to have a class action lawsuit slap them in the face. My ears aren't lying.
How do you know he didn't have the Klippel set to 'invert-polarity'? Or perhaps has an anti-entropy field stones which would itself invert the polarity of the entire room.Erin's foul flavored A130 is nothing more than an alignment error. Here's mine, purchased fall of 2023, alignment restored by reversing polarity on both speakers. Try it. You will be stunned at the result. Everything improves.... imagining, resolution, vocal presence, clean low end....it's all there.
Uh huh.So the golden eared circle wankers are certain that A130 sound the same connected either way. Well that's too bad because alot of people are getting cheated.
Okay, I was going to let this go away, but no. This is absurd.Ahhhhh the irony never quits. A newbie getting ridiculed on a hifi forum by those unable to recognize a speaker designed with a correct phase...a gift to the world you are.
Zaph zd5 uses a ladder delay network. Not sure if that qualifies as an all-passOkay, I was going to let this go away, but no. This is absurd.
Reversing the speaker wires does not change a damn thing. All you're doing when you reverse both speakers' polarity is changing which way a voltage moves the driver. Neither is "correct". You cannot get rid of excess phase rotation by doing this. While it is possible to make a passive all-pass filter, I have not once seen it done in a speaker crossover - only in actives. Besides that, more complex passive crossovers equal more insertion loss and therefore lower sensitivity on top of higher BOM costs.
All the above is moot, because there is no excess phase rotation in this speaker because the crossovers are competently designed. The phase wrap at the crossover is about as textbook as it gets.
This was stupid. I lost interest in my headphones because of my A130's, I'm not using the V1900 lately because my fifteen dollar HTR-5730 has a wider soundstage, better transparency and a nicer frequency profile. And I'm done pretending the NEC is as good as my Music Hall CD25 in it's own ways. I think it has better resolution. The Music Hall stomps it at everything else.Screw those particular measurements. I'm enjoying sonic bliss for under four hundred bucks:
-A130 that sound like my frickin' Grados: 200.00
-RX-V1900 from Goodwill.com:
50.00
-NEC CD650E from The Bay:
75.00
Likely no, but FOR SURE, his wife could hear the change from the Kitchen, even when doing dishes.Have a wife or loved one help you do a blind test to see if you can tell. Get back to us.
Haha. Nope, I was so wrong about the cd players. The refined sounding Music Hall is more pleasant (and complimentary) with the inherent "flaws" of my speakers (and loudspeakers in general) but with headphones that ancient NEC is a magic box of richness, unleashing an orgasmic amount of information in comparison. I'm so lucky to have the NEC CD-650. Thank you Jesus!This was stupid. I lost interest in my headphones because of my A130's, I'm not using the V1900 lately because my fifteen dollar HTR-5730 has a wider soundstage, better transparency and a nicer frequency profile. And I'm done pretending the NEC is as good as my Music Hall CD25 in it's own ways. I think it has better resolution. The Music Hall stomps it at everything else.