aarmath
Member
My first thread (Hoping it will be a great discussion) on ASR!
Why is the Full Bridge feature in select Class D modules not touted upfront as a feature?
From what I have read Full Bridge has fundamental positive attributes like efficient use of source voltage for far higher power output compared to a half-bridge topology.
Apart from that there are inherent benefits like rejection of Bus Pumping, shootout current.
& yet I don't see that being discussed or featured by manufacturers in their product specs.
Or is it that the Full Bridge/Bridge-Tied-Load aspect is a vanilla feature that is already widespread in Class D modules & is taken for granted.?
For example - (And this is what prompted my post) - In one of the sub-forums a poster commented that the ICEPower 700AS (1 & 2) module is Full-Bridge.
In closing, I understand that Full Bridge is a relatively expensive proposition. But does the cost outweigh the fundamental benefits?
Why is the Full Bridge feature in select Class D modules not touted upfront as a feature?
From what I have read Full Bridge has fundamental positive attributes like efficient use of source voltage for far higher power output compared to a half-bridge topology.
Apart from that there are inherent benefits like rejection of Bus Pumping, shootout current.
& yet I don't see that being discussed or featured by manufacturers in their product specs.
Or is it that the Full Bridge/Bridge-Tied-Load aspect is a vanilla feature that is already widespread in Class D modules & is taken for granted.?
For example - (And this is what prompted my post) - In one of the sub-forums a poster commented that the ICEPower 700AS (1 & 2) module is Full-Bridge.
In closing, I understand that Full Bridge is a relatively expensive proposition. But does the cost outweigh the fundamental benefits?