Katji
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2017
- Messages
- 2,989
- Likes
- 2,276
No, sorry [LOL] I realised later that it might be misunderstood. And it was.I do not understand what you are referring to. Do you take offense with my providing a visual example?
Now it needs the reply you were replying to, to make it clearer. But here's yours, with what could've been emphasised:
Maybe even use a huge font, and repeat three times.If you want to see what that "impedance interaction" looks like: here is a measurement of my Clear hooked up to my soundcard vs my AVR (ignore everything beyond 1KHz, mic not accurate enough for that). Suffice it to say, the AVR did not sound good.
>24 hours later, after we had eventually "established" that speaker impedance, minimum impedance not the "nominal impedance" spec is the most important factor, someone comes again with the same..."dogmatic[?]...whatever.
I might still be ready to be triggered into a rant about the "you..must..do..volume..matching, otherwise..." thing...