Anyone tried powering this unit with a linear power supply (compared to its stock "phone charger")?
Uh huh.Answering my own question after six months.
Bought two LPS over the past half year. And yes, it does make a noticeable difference. I'm now finally settled on a LPS about the same size as the DAC itself. The previous one was about half the size.
Both LPS will make the bass tighter, imaging better. For tracks with fast and punchy bass, both make a noticeable difference.
Actually the bigger one tighten the bass so much, i was wondering whether it did too much. So I couldn't decide which to keep, the more expensive one is a bit bulky to the point, I really wanted to keep the smaller one. The smaller LPS has slight more boomy bass but subjectively that could sound better. I'm using HD800 with the DAC.
Did it do anything for the noise floor at all? For IEMs if found this dac/amp isn't the best for that. Sure while playing music it's not that bad but I can still hear it. My FiiO BTR3 does a way better job for IEMs for noise floor.Answering my own question after six months.
Bought two LPS over the past half year. And yes, it does make a noticeable difference. I'm now finally settled on a LPS about the same size as the DAC itself. The previous one was about half the size.
Both LPS will make the bass tighter, imaging better. For tracks with fast and punchy bass, both make a noticeable difference.
Actually the bigger one tighten the bass so much, i was wondering whether it did too much. So I couldn't decide which to keep, the more expensive one is a bit bulky to the point, I really wanted to keep the smaller one. The smaller LPS has slight more boomy bass but subjectively that could sound better. I'm using HD800 with the DAC.
A few days back, a friend of mine who knows a thing or two about mastering came to visit. I asked him to compared the two LPS. He prefer the bulky LPS so much. It helped convince myself to re-config my desktop space to accommodate the LPS as a fixed setup.
The smaller LPS costs about 80USD, the bigger one 150USD
Please do not ask me which brand/model I bought and from where. You may really want to buy/try and decide yourself.
Compared to the stock adaptor, LPS did "smooth" the noise floor but it is still there if you on highly sensitive IEM.Did it do anything for the noise floor at all? For IEMs if found this dac/amp isn't the best for that. Sure while playing music it's not that bad but I can still hear it. My FiiO BTR3 does a way better job for IEMs for noise floor.
I'll just believe everything on your word then ...Please do not ask me which brand/model I bought and from where. You may really want to buy/try and decide yourself.
There are no algorithms to process a DSD signal. Existing DSP techniques all operate on PCM.Has anyone else noticed that the EQ functionality is disabled when the unit is playing DSD content?
Convert to PCM at 44.1 kHz or above at the source. The analog signal is reproduced losslessly up to the Nyquist frequency, even with DSD to PCM conversion.The issue for me is that I cannot reap the benefits of the EQ capabilities from this device when I stream my DSD content. I'm fine with a device converting to PCM in order to apply equalization (as does the RME ADI-2 DAC FS). Neither the documentation nor any reviews I've read, mention this limitation of the functionality. Indeed, DIRAC also is not functional on this device when streaming DSD.
@yakman, i don't understand this comment??? everything you say loses credibility. how come you wouldn't share the lps', assuming that you actually bought lps'? the point of communities like this is to share information. you sought info about lps for this unit and, if another member found lps that worked, what would you want? did you actually buy lps?Please do not ask me which brand/model I bought and from where. You may really want to buy/try and decide yourself.
Lossless sources like PC and Mbox can be connected digitally. The analog input can be used for lossy sources like a turntable, as the ADC is well above the fidelity of the source anyway.Does the benefit of having PEQ available offset the drawback of the analog-digital conversion that occurs for analog sources?
I've read above it seems they are using a competent ADC, and it would open up the ability to use a myriad of different headphones because they could be universally corrected for from all sources I'd be using (turntable SE'd, USB from PC, and Mbox coaxial output).
Thanks in advance.
David
You must select the output in the menu.Can someone tell me how the headphone/line out work? If i plug my headphones in does the line out stop playing and vice versa? or are there output options in the menu?
Thanks
I considered the 788 before ordering a 789. From my research, you can either choose headphone OR line out output.*Not both simultaneouslyCan someone tell me how the headphone/line out work? If i plug my headphones in does the line out stop playing and vice versa? or are there output options in the menu?
Thanks
You must select the output in the menu.
I considered the 788 before ordering a 789. From my research, you can either choose headphone OR line out output.*Not both simultaneously