Pls bear with me.
Say a thousand reliable tests show that 'subjectivists' are right, they 'scientifically' prove there are differences.
What is the effect on the 'objectivists'?! What do you do, think, feel at that moment?
IMHO, 'objectivists' do not look for tests & research for truth, but to show the other camp is wrong. Very different things.
Then, why is an objectivist an objectivist?! Because measurements say so (and that could be right) OR cause they listened and draw this conclusion?
Ironically, John Yang never expressly endorsed the 'objectivist' statement that all DACs measuring the same sound the same.
Also, did you read the 'measuring & listening' clarifications on Benchmark site, that manufacture one of the best measuring amps? These highly competent people are not that drastic in their statements as you 'objectivists' here. Very strange.
Say a thousand reliable tests show that 'subjectivists' are right, they 'scientifically' prove there are differences.
What is the effect on the 'objectivists'?! What do you do, think, feel at that moment?
IMHO, 'objectivists' do not look for tests & research for truth, but to show the other camp is wrong. Very different things.
Then, why is an objectivist an objectivist?! Because measurements say so (and that could be right) OR cause they listened and draw this conclusion?
Ironically, John Yang never expressly endorsed the 'objectivist' statement that all DACs measuring the same sound the same.
Also, did you read the 'measuring & listening' clarifications on Benchmark site, that manufacture one of the best measuring amps? These highly competent people are not that drastic in their statements as you 'objectivists' here. Very strange.