bo_knows
Addicted to Fun and Learning
Congratulations! Enjoy.In the house...unpacking and doing 300 hr speaker burn in...
Congratulations! Enjoy.In the house...unpacking and doing 300 hr speaker burn in...
Curious to see if you’re willing to adopt me.In the house...unpacking and doing 300 hr speaker burn in...
Went back to the dealer and tried the BOM with different Luxman. You can see the M-10X being demoed, the 595SE on the right and a 509X next to me. He also got a 507Z(close to me, not in the picture) that I did not try. Honestly, I would be happy with any of these amps with the BOM. But I can see a pair of M-10X being my end game amps.
View attachment 227462
Agreed. But I can assure you he knows what he’s doing to be able to bring in all the gear he brings in.That room looks really naked and tiny for such speakers to be honest.
Congrats!!In the house...unpacking and doing 300 hr speaker burn in...
Like this???In the house...unpacking and doing 300 hr speaker burn in...
How's the sound so far?In the house...unpacking and doing 300 hr speaker burn in...
How close would you get to to the blade
1or 2 with a Genelec 8361+ subs?
What is the source of this chart?I just looked at the FR of the different drivers and looks like the woofers are mainly tuned for bass below 60Hz.
If you would set the usual 80 Hz 24dB/oct highpass filter, would the woofers even do anything?
Even a 60Hz HP filter would make those side woofers pretty useless or am I getting something wrong about this?
stereophile. Just edited my question, I misinterpreted the graphWhat is the source of this chart?
Stereophile. And, the graph is Blade Two Meta, not Blade One.What is the source of this chart?
That should apply to all published graphs/illustrations.The graph should be posted with the legend, and the link!
They are probably nice speakers. But putting the crossover at the baffle step is a pretty basic idea if you design speakers. In fact, that's where my lower crossover is.View attachment 225237
Kef Blade one Meta seems to be a loudspeaker where they have thought of everything .
The crossover frequency for the uni - Q driver seems to be set at 350 Hz . The baffle is about 36 cm wide .
Using the formula by Troelsgravesen for baffle stepcorrection 11600/36 = 322 Hz , this means they have thought of having a wide enough baffle to go down almost to the rooms transition frequency , without using any eq. This is only one of many factors Kef have thought about .
Maybe some of you have heard the Blade 1 ? How did it sound ?
View attachment 225238
Read more here :
KEF Blade One Meta Loudspeaker
KEF's flagship Blade cuts to the heart of the music, and with 'MAT' on board its edge has never been keener More than a decade after their launch, there's still nothing quite like the KEF Blade One speakers. Well, OK, there's the smaller Blade Two [HFN Jul '15], but the point still stands! The...www.hifinews.com