• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

What??? $24 Million for new fridges on board Air Force One!

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,667
Likes
241,023
Location
Seattle Area
I am in the wrong business! https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/26/politics/air-force-one-refrigerator-contract-boeing/index.html

Washington (CNN)Air Force One is primed to receive an upgrade that will include new refrigerators expected to cost American taxpayers nearly $24 million.

The US Air Force awarded Boeing a $23.6 million contract in December to replace two of the five "cold chiller units" aboard the aircraft used by President Donald Trump.

"The current rear lower lobe cold chiller units being replaced are the original commercial equipment delivered with the aircraft in 1990. The units were based on the technology at the time and designed for short-term food storage," Air Force spokesperson Ann Stefanek told CNN.

"Although serviced on a regular basis, reliability has decreased with failures increasing, especially in hot/humid environments. The units are unable to effectively support mission requirements for food storage," she said.

Due to the fact that Air Force One is a one-of-a-kind aircraft, many of its components require unique testing by the Federal Aviation Administration and the cost of the testing is included in the price of the component, in this case refrigerators. The $24 million contract will cover the costs of engineering support services for the new chillers -- including prototype design, manufacturing and installation, according to the DOD contract.

"The units and associated aircraft structural modifications are being specially designed to provide nearly 70 cubic feet of temperature-controlled (refrigeration/freezer) storage to support on-board personnel for an extended period of time, without having to restock while abroad," Stefanek told CNN.

"The engineering required to design, manufacture, conduct environmental testing and obtain Federal Aviation Administration certification are included in the cost," she said.

Former senior adviser to President Barack Obama Eric Schultz mocked the high price tag in a tweet on Friday, saying, "we would have been impeached."
 
  • Like
Reactions: trl

Wombat

Master Contributor
Joined
Nov 5, 2017
Messages
6,722
Likes
6,464
Location
Australia
This. You have no say in it, unlike the decision to buy a cable. :)
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,667
Likes
241,023
Location
Seattle Area
What I want to know is why they did not consider getting rid of the fridge and stocking up on MREs. Beside American, there are other versions including of course Russian!

 
  • Like
Reactions: trl

RayDunzl

Grand Contributor
Central Scrutinizer
Joined
Mar 9, 2016
Messages
13,250
Likes
17,194
Location
Riverview FL
$23.6 million

$23.6m / 327,095,201 = $0.072 each.

Well, I will consider my dime well spent next time I'm on board.
 

Wombat

Master Contributor
Joined
Nov 5, 2017
Messages
6,722
Likes
6,464
Location
Australia
I wonder why 'fridges used in airliners that accommodate hundreds of passengers were not suitable?
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,767
Likes
37,628
Hey these have been in use since 1990. This is less than a million a year. Boy you just can't please some people.

Should they just have a big cooler and stock up on ice every flight? At 20,000 feet the temperature is almost always a few degrees below zero. Going higher it gets even colder quite dramatically. So maybe they do have this big ice bucket. Circulate some outside air thru it to freeze it and then hold the cool between flights.

Hey this beats those hammers they paid so much for. And that Air Force mini-fridge that had to meet specs that would have left the crew dead. Was a coffee maker like that too. Was describe as useful because after a crash killing the crew the investigative team could arrive with cool drinks and hot coffee waiting on them. Then there was the $174 pencils. Just a regular pencil. Listed in the budget as a "personal, portable, hand held, communication device".
 

RayDunzl

Grand Contributor
Central Scrutinizer
Joined
Mar 9, 2016
Messages
13,250
Likes
17,194
Location
Riverview FL
upload_2018-1-27_0-55-16.png
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,667
Likes
241,023
Location
Seattle Area
Hey this beats those hammers they paid so much for. And that Air Force mini-fridge that had to meet specs that would have left the crew dead. Was a coffee maker like that too. Was describe as useful because after a crash killing the crew the investigative team could arrive with cool drinks and hot coffee waiting on them. Then there was the $174 pencils. Just a regular pencil. Listed in the budget as a "personal, portable, hand held, communication device".
Ahem. In early 1980s I was working for a company called Gould. We were chuckling over the news of those expensive hammer only to hear one of the guys whisper that it was our company that did that! Here is the story: http://truth-out.org/archive/compon...ntinues-to-overpay-for-everything-lets-fix-it

The $436 hammer was one of the best illustrative cases. After Congressman Berkley Bedell (D-Iowa) found this overpriced hammer in the Navy procurement system, he asked the Navy auditors to audit the costs and show where the fraud and waste were located. The Navy dutifully audited the hammer costs based on approved cost formulas and found that the costs on the hammer were "exorbitant but legal." In other words, the markup on the hammer by the contractor was outrageous, but the Navy had approved the markups, thereby institutionally legalizing these ridiculously high prices for the baseline in the future.

The following chart, taken from Navy documents, demonstrates how a $7 hammer, purchased by Gould Corporation in the 1980s, grew to cost the Navy $436.

Remember, these are markups and time billed for every hammer.

Gould, Simulated Systems Division

Purchased Item
Item – hammer, hand, sledge – Qty – 1 each

Direct Material $ 7.00
Material Packaging 1.00
Material Handling Overhead @ 19.8% 2.00

· Spares/Repair Dept.
1.0 hours
· Program Support/Admin.
0.4 hours
· Program Management
1.0 hours
· Secretarial
0.2 hours

_____________________________________________

Subtotal: 2.6 hours Engr. Support $37.00
Engr. O/H [Overhead] @ 110% 41.00


· Mechanical Sub-assembly 0.3 hours
· Quality Control 0.9 hours
· Operations Program Mgt. 1.5 hours
· Program Planning 4.0 hours
· Mfg. Project Engr. 1.0 hours
· Q.A. (quality assurance) 0.1 hours
_____________________________________________

Subtotal: 7.8 hrs Mfg. Support 93.00
Mfg O/H @ 110% 102.00

___________
$ 283.00

G & A [General & Administrative]@ 31.8% 90.00
___________
$373.00
Fee [profit] 56.00
Facilities Capital Cost of Money 7.00
__________
TOTAL PRICE $ 436.00
 

Dismayed

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2018
Messages
392
Likes
417
Location
Boston, MA
McDonalds burgers need to be refrigerated?
 
Top Bottom