No, but if you read the white paper they talk about using Klippel.
But they don't publish any actual data of their finished speakers... which is weird, after telling how much a Spin is important and often correlated with listener's preference. All I see in their white paper are REW graphs with ridiculously huge vertical scale. What's the point?
Educating the consumers?
I mean, yes, they make some highly relevant statements... But how do we know if they applied these principles to design their speakers ?Educating the consumers?
Yeah I get that. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt right now, and assuming that they did use Klippel and thinking that they might have designed something good (albeit expensive) Doesn't Magico (even more expensive) do the same thing. Say they use Klippel but no publish results?
Totally agree.
Somebody here found Klippel results for Magico, and they're quite good.
We are talking about some ≈85 000€ speakers, so I personally do not.
Right. And that is absolutely not worthy of imitation.
Where, where ?
Yes, and it wouldn't surprise me if these were good as well. Why go to the trouble and expense of Klippel, add in all the DSP stuff, and not end up with a very good speaker. Take away the awful treble clef symbol, and use the acoustic design principles, and maybe it's a really good speaker that you could live with? As I said in my initial post, I hesitated to link it, but there's somethings in it that interest me.
I wouldn't either with the current design or cost.
That's an interesting speaker, indeed. So, thanks for sharing it !
Yeah, I'm really skeptical that arrangement of drivers can yield good results.
Maybe you bring them out to scare off unwelcome guests?
