Topping has lots of work to do to earn a quality reputation. It doesn't help when the facts get muddied (for instance, Ampguy actually got his PA5
replacement 1 year 3 months ago, that's not ~2 years of reliable operation, it's 1.25 years
). And owners really have no way of measuring the actual defect, our ears are not the right tool. Many people had difficult time identifying, even worse the issue was intermittent for some. I am sure given the descriptions captured of people's failed amps, there are likely many in the field that the owner can't or doesn't know is defective. And let's be serious, the encapsulation stresses were never taken into account in the board layout and manufacturing process (Topping has said as much in the ask me questions thread), this is a systematic issue, and if Topping has a competent reliability engineer, they are saying "guaranteed early-life-fails, can't predict field failure rates, can't predict wear-out, can we recall?"
From L30 blowing headphones, to repeated issues with their speaker amps, to poorly implemented volume controls, to crossed wires, Topping should learn. All they had to do is fix the PA5 by ditching the encapsulation and make customer whole. Instead we get new variation of the old, with slightly better SINAD perhaps.