• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Onkyo C-733 Review (CD Player)

NTTY

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 27, 2018
Messages
587
Likes
2,377
Location
Switzerland
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Onkyo C-733 CD stereo player and transport.

Onkyo_C-733_001.jpg



Before starting, please note that I'm not using an AP but REW software with a Motu Ultralite MK5 pro interface. This setup has its limitations, but to test a pure CD Player, it's good enough.

Over the last two years of experiencing CD Players measurements, I came to make myself a Test CD. And after several reviews here and feedback from many members, I'm happy to share the latest version Test CD which has much improved over the last weeks (thanks again to @restorer-john and @AnalogSteph). I will keep on updating this review with the latest edition of the test CD.

One important note: since the input gain of my measurement interface (Motu) can only be adjusted by steps of 1dB, and because not all CD players output a precise exact 2Vrms output, I had to set a convention for my tests, which is the below:
  • If the 0dBFS output of the CD player matches the input of the Motu no higher than -0.6dBFS, then I don’t adjust the input gain of the Motu.
  • From -0.59dBFS up to 0dBFS, I reduce the input gain by 1dB to prevent clipping the Motu ADC.
So that means my measurements are done between -1.59dBFS and -0.6dBFS at the input of the Motu. This does not change most of the measurements but could provide a 1dB advantage on some noise calculations, which is a reasonable variance.

The reason for this review is mainly after I read the review of the Cayin Mini-CD MKII. Since I'm used to test old CD Players, I wanted to perform measurements of an older Japanese mini CD Player.


Onkyo C-733 - Presentation

This CD player is from 2005 and was part of the top line of mini components from Onkyo. It was available as part of the PHA-933 combo including an integrated amplifier, a tuner and this CD player.

The C-733 features a 24bits/192kHz converter from Cirrus Logic (CS4396-KS). Back panel shows two optical digital outputs (to compare DACs :)) and RCA connectors. That's all, no phones out.

Onkyo_C-733_003.jpg


The published specs were the below:

Onkyo_C-733_008.jpg


Inside, all electronic cards are labelled Onkyo and well arranged, as far as I can tell.

Onkyo_C-733_004.jpg


The elements of interest are:
  • VSLC (Vector Linear Shaping Circuitry): This is proprietary noise shaping which was featured on a number of CD Players from Onkyo.
  • Exclusive Direct Digital Path: Onkyo says they took great care of the digital output, which is nice when thinking about using it as a transport. That's also probably why there are two Optical outputs.
  • DAC Wolfson 24bits/192kHz: Someone forgot to warn the marketing that they went for a Cirrus Logic (CS4396-KS) instead :)
  • Sony KSS-213CL: as opposed to the KSS-213C which was used in many CD players, the CL version found its way into higher end players, including four Accuphase. I could not find reliable information about the differences between KSS-213C and KSS-213CL.

Onkyo_C-733_005.jpg


On the above picture, you can see the CS DAC bottom right. Output stage uses the infamous NE5532. Note some sort of tape positioned on multiple caps, I did not see that elsewhere before.

Using this player was surprisingly pleasant. The drive is extremely fast as it equals the best I have, that is good news. I'm not asking much more than that, and with modern CD players, I don't get it often...

I got this player for 120$ or so, and that was including the amplifier and tuner from the same combo (named PHA-933).


Onkyo C-733 - Measurements (Analog out)

From now on, I will be consistent with my measurements as I described them in the post “More than we hear”, and as I reported them in the below review. Over time, this will help comparing the devices I reviewed.

The Onkyo C-733 outputs 1.92Vrsm, and there was a slight channel imbalance of around 0.05dB (which is very good). The single-ended outputs invert absolute polarity.

Here you go with the 999.91Hz sine @0dBFS (without dither):

Onkyo_C-733_999.91Hz_0dBFS_LR.jpg


Right and left channels are shown and are identical, it's not so often. THD sits at -100dB and so will clear CD Audio content.

I add a view of a 999.91Hz @-6dBFS (without dither):

Onkyo_C-733_999.91Hz_-6dBFS_LR.jpg


We see that the distorsion increased by 6dB relative to the carrier. In fact, the distortion remains the same until -9dBFS, at which point it goes a little down. That means THD ranges between -94dBr to -100dBr from 0dBFS to -30dBFS, and that is very good as it ensures a wide dynamic.

The below is a new measurement with shaped dither added to the signal and compared to no dither:

Onkyo_C-733_999.91Hz_-0dBFS_NOvsShapedDither.jpg


This is to see if the player would benefit from shaping the noise below 10kHz. Here the decrease, by roughly 5dB, of the noise floor is limited, so not much is to be gained from shaping the noise.

And to make the above clearer, the below is the same view but taken from the digital files:

1730565474106.png


Notice the change in scale. This is the benefit we can expect from shaping the noise and we are not there with the Onkyo.

You probably already noticed that this is a very quiet CD player, with minimum power supply–related spuriae in its output (below -120dB at 50Hz) :

Onkyo_C-733_1kHz_0dBFS_PowerSupply.jpg



Bandwidth (now measured from a long term average of periodic white noise) is nearly flat:

Onkyo_C-733_BW.jpg


We see -0.2dB at 20Hz and -0.1dB at 20kHz. We also find the 0.05dB channel imbalance which is a very good result.

This is below a view of oversampling filter behavior (from white noise) and together with dual tones 18kHz+20kHz (AES17) :

Onkyo_C-733_1kHz_Filter_L.jpg


As you can see, the out of band attenuation is 90dB, which is decent. Artifacts of the conversion (aliases) are therefore well reduced. No sign of massive Noise Shaping either, at least up to 48kHz.
From the above, you can also see that the IMD is quite low (-94.6dB).

Multitone (1/10 decade) shows a happy CD player, not having issue to clear 16bits of data:

Onkyo_C-733_Multitone_1-10_LR.jpg


This is the Jitter test:

Onkyo_C-733_JTest_Corrected.jpg


This is an overlay of Analog (bleu) and Digital outputs (red). The Onkyo C-733 does not suffer from Jitter. We see only low level distorsion (additional rays) of no concerns.

Started with the Teac VRDS-20 review, and on your request + support to get it done (more here), I'm adding now an "intersample-overs" test which intends to identify the behavior of the digital filtering and DAC when it come to process near clipping signals. Because of the oversampling, there might be interpolated data that go above 0dBFS and would saturate (clip) the DAC and therefore the output. And this effect shows through distorsion (THD+N measurement up to 96kHz):



Intersample-overs tests
Bandwidth of the THD+N measurements is 20Hz - 96kHz
5512.5 Hz sine,
Peak = +0.69dBFS
7350 Hz sine,
Peak = +1.25dBFS
11025 Hz sine,
Peak = +3.0dBFS
Teac VRDS-20-30.7dB-26.6dB-17.6dB
Yamaha CD-1-84.6dB-84.9dB-78.1dB
Denon DCD-900NE-34.2dB-27.1dB-19.1dB
Denon DCD-SA1-33.6dB-27.6dB-18.3dB
Onkyo C-733-88.3dB-40.4dB-21.2dB
Denon DCD-3560-30.2dB-24.7dB-17.4dB
Marantz CD-73-50.3dB-52.0dB-27.7dB


I kept some references and will keep the same for other reviews, so you can quickly compare. The results of the Onkyo C-733 mean the oversampling filter has roughly 1dB headroom, which is good because it will prevent intersample-overs and therefore clipping where it's most likely to happen. The Yamaha CD-1 shines here because it's old enough not to have an oversampling filter.

Stereophile was often using the 3DC measurement as a prof of low noise DAC. It is from an undithered 1kHz sine at -90.31dBFS. With 16bits, the signal should appear (on a scope) as the 3DC levels of the smallest sign magnitude digital signal:

Onkyo_C-733_1kHz_-90.31dBFS_R.jpg


Hmmm, a little too noisy for my taste. We can still recognize the 3 DC levels, though. From the digital output it looks as it should:

Onkyo_C-733_3DC_Opti.jpg


The ringing is due to Gibbs Phenomenon. So theoretically, a 1bit DAC should nail this test. But I suppose there’s too much low level noise in the Onkyo. I will test again with the very silent Cosmos E1AD in the future, to give it another chance.


Other measurements (not shown):
  • IMD AES-17 DFD "Analog" (18kHz & 20kHz 1:1) : -94.6dB
  • IMD AES-17 DFD "Digital" (17'987Hz & 19'997Hz 1:1) : -89.8dB
  • IMD AES-17 MD (41Hz & 7993Hz 4:1): -93.9dB
  • IMD CCIF (18kHz & 20kHz 1:1) : -89.7dB
  • IMD TDFD (13'58Hz & 19841Hz 1:1) : -104.4dB
  • IMD TDFD Bass (41Hz & 89Hz 1:1) : -102.4dB
  • IMD SMPTE (60Hz & 7kHz 1:4) : -84dB
  • Dynamic Range : 96.5dB
  • Crosstalk: -130dB (100Hz), -119dB (1kHz), -100dB (10kHz)
  • Pitch Error : 19'997.06Hz (19'997Hz requested) ie +0.0003% (3ppm)

Last but not least, I like to have a look a the THD vs Frequency when using a -12dBFS signal. This has proven to me to be a key differentiator, especially when I'm reviewing an old CD Player using R2R conversion. Here are the results with the Onkyo (Left and Right analog Channels shown, with one digital channel) :

Onkyo_C-733_THDvsFreq_-12dBFS_LR.jpg


It is the best measurement I've seen (of this one), equal to the best CD Players I own. The red trace is the digital out. This view restricts the measurement to THD over 5 harmonics only. What we see is that the DAC of this player adds only 2dB of distortion at 1kHz (plot), and more at low level, but of no consequences. I am impressed simply because I've never seen better so far, and often (much) worse.


Onkyo C-733 - Measurements (Optical Out)

I've seen several of you reviewing CD players using their digital outputs, in case the results could be improved from an external DAC.

The digital output (optical only) is as what we expect it to be, perfect (999.91Hz @-0.01dBFS without dither):

Onkyo_C-733_999.91Hz_-0dBFS_OptiOut.jpg


This is what is on the test CD, it’s equivalent to ripping it on a computer, except that here, it is a true live FFT from the S/PDIF TOSLINK output of the Onkyo. Note the very precise 999.91Hz that I get, which means the clock is better than 10ppm in the Onkyo (3ppm in fact, as per the pitch error test I reported before).

The below is new from the latest Test CD, and shows an overlay of 999.91Hz @-0.01dBFS without dither and with shaped dither:

Onkyo_C-733_999.91Hz_0dBFS_Opti.jpg


This demonstrate again no modification of the digital signal as it is the same on the Test CD.

Onkyo said in the brochure that they paid attention to the digital outputs, and yes they did.

This little player will therefore be a perfect transport.


Onkyo C-733 - Testing the drive

What would be good measurements if the drive would not properly read a slightly scratched CD, or one that was created at the limits of the norm? The below tests reply to these questions.


Test typeTechnical testResults
Variation of linear cutting velocityFrom 1.20m/s to 1.40m/sPass
Variation of track pitchFrom 1.5µm to 1.7µmPass
Combined variations of track pitch and velocityFrom 1.20m/s & 1.5µm to 1.40m/s & 1.7µmPass
HF detection (asymmetry pitch/flat ratio)Variation from 2% to 18%Pass
Dropouts resistanceFrom 0.05mm (0.038ms) to 4mm (3.080ms)Up to 2mm
Combined dropouts and smallest pitchFrom 1.5µm & 1mm to 1.5µm & 2.4mmUp to 2mm
Successive dropoutsFrom 2x0.1mm to 2x3mmUp to 1.5mm

The drive was able to consistently continue playing, without generating typical digital clicks, with dropouts of up to 2mm. The interpolation effect remained hidden to my ears when it kicked-off (at 1.5mm dropouts) and succeeded to maintain a constant flow up to 2mm dropouts. The Onkyo had no issue with variable linear velocity and/or track pitch, as well as with HF detection.


Conclusion

The Analog output of this player is close enough to what's digitally recorded on the test CD and only limited by low level analog noise. If we can probably find a better external DAC, there's obviously little more to expect.

Well done to Onkyo, and for those of you still enjoying spinning a CDA, you have more than a competent player here, which you can also use as a transport.
 
Last edited:
Very interesting, thank you. And a great little CD player!
 
Thank you!

And additional information, in the context of using this player as a "Transport", find below a measurement when used as such and feeding an SMSL PS200 DAC (1kHz @0dBFS dithered):

Onkyo_C-733_1kHz_0dBFS_via-SMSL-PS200_L.jpg


There are indeed improvements, as it’s getting very close to what's recorded on the Test CD.

————
Flo
 
Last edited:
Thank you and funny that it mentions a Wolfson’s DAC while it’s a Cirrus Logic inside. Fact is that the other Onkyo CD players of the era were indeed using DACs from Wolfson. Someone just forgot to update the communication team about that slight difference :)

————
Flo
 
Last edited:
I'm listening to a CD on my Onkyo C-7030 CD player now as I'm reading this. I'm not sure which dac chip it uses, but the RCA outputs sound just as good as using the optical out going to another DAC. It wasn't expensive. I wish it was a little smaller, but it works great as a player or a transport.
 
I saw mention elsewhere that Wolfson was acquired by Cirrus Logic. I'd be curious about the part number marking on the DAC chip.
 
Hello, based on your review I am currently looking for a CD player to listen to music. The problem is that I am in between choosing several models
1.Onkyo C-733
2. Denon DCD 1700NE
3. Marantz CD50/60
4. Rotel 1572MkII
5. Audiolab 9000cdt

How would you put them in order from best to worst?
I will listen them only Analog - RCA!
So I really need a player which I am not going to change in the next 5/10 years

If you know anything better tell me!
Thank You!
 
Hello, I did not test any of them (except the Onkyo, of course) but I must admit I like a lot Denon and Rotel in general.

The Denon CDC 1700NE is a high end player and plays SACD too. I still have a Denon DCD-720AE, but I was using an undithered Test CD from Denon at the time I ran measurements, so I could test it again and report here. Its filtering out of band looked very old fashioned, low attenuation and lots of ringing (it's probably intentional).

I also have a DENON DCD-SA1 which is next on my list to present here, but I'm waiting to receive the SACD test disc, so I can be exhaustive. In the meantime I could run my current set of measurements with the DCD-720AE, if I find time.

The lower level Marantz CD6007 I tested was not perfect in its output when playing CD audio (strange filtering behavior), which was a surprise. It does not mean it would be the same with CD50/60.

Audiolab, I have no experience with their devices.

Regards
 
Hello, based on your review I am currently looking for a CD player to listen to music. The problem is that I am in between choosing several models
1.Onkyo C-733
2. Denon DCD 1700NE
3. Marantz CD50/60
4. Rotel 1572MkII
5. Audiolab 9000cdt

How would you put them in order from best to worst?
I will listen them only Analog - RCA!
So I really need a player which I am not going to change in the next 5/10 years

If you know anything better tell me!
Thank You!
I'm listening to a CD on my Onkyo C-7030 CD player now as I'm reading this. I'm not sure which dac chip it uses, but the RCA outputs sound just as good as using the optical out going to another DAC. It wasn't expensive. I wish it was a little smaller, but it works great as a player or a transport.
I have that same cd player. It's good player for the price.
 
Hello, based on your review I am currently looking for a CD player to listen to music. The problem is that I am in between choosing several models
1.Onkyo C-733
2. Denon DCD 1700NE
3. Marantz CD50/60
4. Rotel 1572MkII
5. Audiolab 9000cdt

How would you put them in order from best to worst?
I will listen them only Analog - RCA!
So I really need a player which I am not going to change in the next 5/10 years

If you know anything better tell me!
Thank You!

I have the Audiolab cd 6000 cdt transporter and I think it is a great player with a good external dac. I also own two Onkyo C-7030 cd players with Wolfson dacs. They are perfectly fine as they are, but will improve a bit with an external dac. All have lasted a few years of light use. I think the most important thing in a CD player is durability and ease of use. With an external dac, you can hardly hear the difference between different CD players.
 
I have the Audiolab cd 6000 cdt transporter and I think it is a great player with a good external dac. I also own two Onkyo C-7030 cd players with Wolfson dacs. They are perfectly fine as they are, but will improve a bit with an external dac. All have lasted a few years of light use. I think the most important thing in a CD player is durability and ease of use. With an external dac, you can hardly hear the difference between different CD players.

With an external dac, there is no difference between different CD players and transports unless one of them is defective*.

* Except when playing a damaged/scratched CD. My 6000CDT is able to correctly play one damaged CD I have that the C-7030 is unable to play. I was also able to rip the CD with a $25 samsung usb dvd drive.
 
Wolfson was acquired by Cirrus in 2014. This player is dated 2005 and the DAC inside is the Cirrus Logic CS4396-KS.

View attachment 386982
That's a rather fancy DAC to be using in a pure CD player (mind you, 599€ wasn't cheap). 120 dB(A) dynamic range, -100 dB THD+N, 192 kHz support, the latest and greatest in 1999. I suppose the relatively high 5th and 7th harmonic were a quirk related to the first-generation DEM and part of why it had been superseded by CS43122 and CS4398 by 2005.

A heavily noise-shaped test signal may reveal the actual capabilities of this player. Depending on output stage design (I unfortunately have been entirely unable to find a service manual), dynamic range may be well in excess of 110 dB.
 
With an external dac, there is no difference between different CD players and transports unless one of them is defective*.

* Except when playing a damaged/scratched CD. My 6000CDT is able to correctly play one damaged CD I have that the C-7030 is unable to play. I was also able to rip the CD with a $25 samsung usb dvd drive.
But why do I want a separate DAC taking up space if I can find a CD player that has one that does it's job correctly?
I have no use for a stand alone DAC.
I do however, have a use for a stand alone ADC.
 
Hello everyone,

As per the recent discussions and interests expressed by the community here, I updated the first post with the below:
  • Pictures of the inside.
  • Mention about the Sony KSS-213CL in use here, which seems to have been adopted by higher-end CD players (eg Accuphase).
  • Jitter test updated with new test file.
  • Additional measurements about Intersample-overs resistance.
  • Additional measurement of 1kHz @-6dBFS.
Thanks to @AnalogSteph @Rja4000 @restorer-john @pkane @sam_adams @JohnPM and @MC_RME for their contributions and support.
 
Last edited:
Hi Flo,
very interesting review!

I have a - very silly, I guess - question: Do you think, that the Onkyo CX-7333 might be a similar good CD-player?

I think it is a silly question, because you might not know the CX-7333 - but they look so similar, similar name, almost same age ... and seems to be way better available!

Here I see some comparison DX-7333 and C-733 ... I see they are not identical, but it is mentioned that both are models of the 'same series'("Weitere Modelle der gleichen Serie") ... but maybe you - or anyone else - have some comment/advice?

Greetings from Germany
Kai
 
Last edited:
The DX-7333 has a much lower grade DAC from Toshiba (TC9268P), so no it will not perform the same at all (20dB worse in SNR...).
Probably the DX-7555 would be very close since it is supposed to use the Wolfson WM8740 which is also the one used in the Orpheus Zero.
 
Hello everyone,

I updated the first message using the latest iteration of the Test CD since I will continue to use this little player as some sort of reference to beat.

I updated nearly everything as I can now go into a lot more details than before with improved precision and reliability.
 
Back
Top Bottom