@Zapper is a working electronics design engineer with vast experience from what I am aware of. It is very fortunate for ASR that we may attract peeps with such a broad wealth of fundamentals and principles knowledge. I am acquiring all sorts of tidbits, details, terminology with new theories that I will use to expand and broaden my knowledge base. The recent RF theories stuff is a perfect example of me having holes in my RF theory understanding and I can now progress into subject matter never before realized. So we all are learning here @ClassG33. This thread has been a real treat for me.I appreciate the certainty. I could imagine this being a typical thing, it being such a high powered amp, but something did not sit right with me about it. Your assessment was amazing to read haha I did not expect such in depth answers, I am going to have to stay with ASR this is most impressive.
Glad to hear it's been a treat!! You 100% led this thread and helped it catch the fire of all the great contributions. Your assessments were well thought out and provocative, brilliant stuff for real. I really appreciate it all!!@Zapper is a working electronics design engineer with vast experience from what I am aware of. It is very fortunate for ASR that we may attract peeps with such a broad wealth of fundamentals and principles knowledge. I am acquiring all sorts of tidbits, details, terminology with new theories that I will use to expand and broaden my knowledge base. The recent RF theories stuff is a perfect example of me having holes in my RF theory understanding and I can now progress into subject matter never before realized. So we all are learning here @ClassG33. This thread has been a real treat for me.
Yeah it was a big blast rehashing those principles of electron flow but @Zapper really changed the entire premise of what is occurring when he made comment about the energy transfer requirements... LoL. I need to re-evaluate all my ideas.Glad to hear it's been a treat!! You 100% led this thread and helped it catch the fire of all the great contributions. Your assessments were well thought out and provocative, brilliant stuff for real. I really appreciate it all!!
I think that is not required.Guess I would do one final test: Moving the two suspects, amp and center speaker, to a different location. Another room, maybe even another house. If I could reproduce the phenomenon there, I would no longer hesitate to contact McIntosh. (Maybe B&W too.)
I was thinking about this possibility too. It's a plausible hypothesis that could be tested.I agree this is totally bizarre and I've never heard of this before.
Possibly dumb question from a rank amateur: if the Mac amp has such an enormous toroidal transformer, and the amp itself seems to make a low-level noise when on (albeit one the OP has to listen closely to hear), is there any possibility that the amp is emitting a powerful EM field because dirty AC (aka DC in the AC line) is saturating the toroidal and the sheer size of the toroidal is generating a field sufficient to excite those speaker drivers?
If that's at all plausible - which it might not be! - then a DC blocker could test the theory and possible eliminate the symptoms, even if it would not solve the root cause.
I don't want to overstate my level of certainty. I put out a hypothesis that I think best explains the observations. But I could be wrong! A hypothesis only value is it gives you something to test. I'm not sure how to test this one without test equipment though. Any ideas?@Zapper said that there must be a very high frequency fundamental for the power transfer to occur across the air gap.
Short answer -- I don't know.How would one go about reaching out to them specifically?
I did do that @DoodskiI think the sample is not from a absolute peak of the distorted sinusoidal waveform and are taken from a very distorted section and as result the proportions of the fundamental frequency versus the odd and even order harmonics are not as they would be with a non-distorted sinusoidal waveform. Maybe try a clean pure 60 Hz sine wave and then compare that to your FT analysis image here<?>
Hmm. That shows a null at 60Hz.I restricted it to the clean channel so I have enough samples (doesn't work with too few) :
View attachment 357823
THis would control for the specific circuit in the house wiring -- which would be (could be) useful information.Guess I would do one final test: Moving the two suspects, amp and center speaker, to a different location. Another room, maybe even another house. If I could reproduce the phenomenon there, I would no longer hesitate to contact McIntosh. (Maybe B&W too.)
This being said, and as mentioned by@Golf overnight (Eastern time) Mac is justly renowned for their service and support.
Introduce more RF energy into the energy power transfer path from the McIntosh to the speaker(s) and see if the waveform changes @ the transducer(s)?I was thinking about this possibility too. It's a plausible hypothesis that could be tested.
I don't want to overstate my level of certainty. I put out a hypothesis that I think best explains the observations. But I could be wrong! A hypothesis only value is it gives you something to test. I'm not sure how to test this one without test equipment though. Any ideas?
I think that is not required.
I still go to Starbucks daily for my vente dark roast 3 cream 4 sugar but otherwise I am now using caffeine extra strength tablets through the day to maintain alertness and prevent dozing. It works well.I think that's all I've got for the moment -- still waitin' for the coffee to kick in!
You can read my dissertation on the topic back at #144 if you're so inclined. Get a mug of coffee first!As @Doodski and I have - ahem - hinted broadly with our comments about speakers and phono cartridges picking up radio signals , the fundamental (no pun intended) issue here seems to be RFI. RFI takes two -- a transmitter and a receiver. The transmitter, of course, is something in or about the amplifier.
It seems your #142 link is corrupted.You can read my dissertation on the topic back at #142 if you're so inclined. Get a mug of coffee first!
Thanks. Could you refresh the page and try it again?It seems your #142 link is corrupted.
The link that you provided works properly now although it is actually post #144 and not #142.Thanks. Could you refresh the page and try it again?