• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required as is 20 years of participation in forums (not all true). There are daily reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

HD800S vs LCD-2 vs ? for EQ

concorde1

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
307
Likes
223
Location
New Zealand
I've had a few different expensive headphones. The only one that has satisfied me long term is the Fostex TH900mk2 with AutoEQ.

I want an open headphone to use with EQ too. I've had an LCD-3 for a year but I think due to this unit's frequency response including its high-Q peaks/dips, it is impossible to EQ to sound nice.

Before that I had an LCD-2 which if I recall correctly sounded a lot better than LCD-3 with AutoEQ.

HD800S and LCD-2 are on sale right now so I'm thinking of picking one of them up.

Some people say the HD800S has low unit variation. I believe I read somewhere LCD-2 has reached the point where the frequency response has been finalised and Audeze is comfortable that all units match closely enough to the same target. That suggests low variation too.

However, clearly the LCD-3 has poor unit consistency as my unit sounds awful with AutoEQ.

The only other candidate I've found is the Dan Clark Expanse, but that's too expensive.

Anything else worth considering 2000 USD or under? Should I go for an HD800S?
 

NapoleonDynamite

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
418
Likes
480
Location
California
I had both LCD-2 and LCD-4. They are heavy and uncomfortable for long listening sessions IMO. Personally I'd go for HD800S.
 

Rayman30

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 5, 2019
Messages
685
Likes
539
If you're used to LCD headphones, I would stick with them imo. Have you considered LCD-X 2021?
 
Top Bottom