I found an avsforum thread that seems useful but I am not technical enough to confirm its accuracy:
https://www.avsforum.com/threads/seos-toe-in.1655081/page-2#post-44964258
Images below from the M2 (708P is based on the M2 design) manual. I will try adjusting the toe-in to see if that helps.
View attachment 81562
View attachment 81563
I've repositioned my couch setup myself (yet again) and now have currently set the front monitors at extreme angles so that they cross each other right in the middle or way in front of the MLP. The MLP is at the very edge of this 30-degree max recommended angle or 15-degrees off-set from the speaker's center axis -- any more toed-in makes center vocals too diffuse sounding. Presonus (Sceptre S8) specifies a horizontal horn dispersion pattern of 110 degrees and so I've utilized this to my advantage -- angled just enough within the horn's dispersion limit so that the high frequencies do not reflect back from the side-walls.
Unfortunately, I could not re-use my original EQ settings. I've also been rather lazy so I have not individually EQ'd each monitor extensively as before, but just simply chose to EQ them in sum from lowest bass frequencies all the way up to just a little over 300Hz (max HR req'd only about 3.3 dB in total including the rears).
The imaging is 'less pin-point' or precise and clear than if the speakers were aimed exactly towards my ears, but it does widen the sweet-spot considerably. So I can sit off-center quite a bit or even lean towards the left side or right side and still get a decent center phantom image. Another thing that helped was by putting my sub near the mid-point between the speakers and applying a higher xo (90Hz) so the bass is not too overpowering when sitting on either extreme ends of the couch.
I use a laser distance meter to make sure both front monitors are 2.01x meters from my forehead at the MLP, and that the rears are 1.41x meters each. I use REW's acoustic timing reference to adjust the delay of the rears relative to the opposite front monitor -- e.g. front left monitor as reference for rear right monitor etc. JRiver has an audio calibration tool, and I find it essential that the relative volume is balanced between all drivers. Adding a few dBs to the sub or subtracting a few dBs from the mains post your previous filtering adjustments can potentially cause some degree of phase cancellation yet all over again -- e.g. when I subtraced 2dB from the sub channel in post.
To a lesser degree, I've toed-in the rears quite a bit as well to take advantage of their waveguide's dispersion pattern and minimize unwanted reflections from the back wall.
The only other main side effect (besides a slightly more diffuse sound effect) from the "extreme toe-in" of the front speakers is the horn-induced "flare up" at higher frequencies, which isn't altogether too noticeable:
post EQ 300Hz and down
PEQ set 1 (or input stage)
Room Correction' (or rather more accurately xo/bass management stage)
PEQ set 2 (or output stage)
just ignore the phase cancellation artifact around 10kHz from summing
Applied default FDW and Var smoothing for clarity
The native phase response of the Sceptre's should be near flat down to around 100Hz. Obviously, reflections and summing together with the rears (JBL LSR305 -- 13dB down from fronts due to upmixing) alters that view considerably. Notably, the higher frequencies from the LSR305s are just smidge little bit more advanced or forward in time relative to my (almost phase-flat) coaxial mains. But this is not so important as long as it's impulse is within a ms or two. Most (more like all) subs across their bandlimited range/span will have 2 to 3 phase wrap-arounds so no surprise there.
Curiously (due to the horn's beamwidth control and extreme angling), sitting at the extreme-most edges of the couch now causes the phantom image to sound as though it's just between the closer monitor and the center of the projector screen (which is an improvement) -- sorry, forgot to mention I've got no center channel. However, sitting right between the extreme edges of the couch and the center MLP causes the phantom image to sound much more focused towards the closer monitor (not so great image-wise -- but the summed tonality and timbre is better than when seated at the extreme ends of the couch -- which was closer/nearer to the side-walls).
Anyhows, this somewhat 'extreme toe-in' setup is better overall for a larger seating area than if I just placed them in the regular way written in most studio monitor manuals.