yes and no
most competent beta versions of software come with data loggers that automatically send reports on a regular basis
There is some truth to that. Although not even close to a substitute for good beta testers but can supplement in production use. You can also get crash reports, etc., that intentional beta testing may not precipitate. "Competent" is a very loaded word that can be a very high bar.
However, this kind of telemetry is useful for monitoring types of activity for regularly used software to detect stumbling blocks, usage metrics, usage flow scenarios, etc., but not for infrequent (if not one-time) use of apps like the Dirac Live (as opposed to DLP). Also, it is difficult to get high quality UX feedback/suggestions from telemetry.
Besides, it takes a lot of time and effort to instrument the code for useful telemetry and worth the effort only when the app is likely to be used continuously by the users, frequently updated to test changes and the data collection useful beyond the beta period. I doubt very much from what I have seen of Dirac software quality that any such useful instrumentation is done. Even the initial license check at every startup had issues.
Not exactly a daily use App Store app this one.