• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Using four bass guitar drivers to build a dual opposed subwoofer project

Just wanted to share this idea for bracing - I think it works really well (as far as the knock-knock test goes) but any comments are more than welcome

20240919_123335.jpg


I think it is called a wire-strainer in English but apparently it has other functions too :)
 
A few updates in the meantime :)

The paint job is done
I have used a sponge brush hence the kind of brushed look (which is very divisive, half of my family does not really fancy it...:rolleyes:)

szivacsecset-25-cm.jpg


20240920_155208.jpg


I have mounted the front speakers:

20240920_204432.jpg


And placed the cabinet to its planned position (remember that this is actually a table for my wife! it has 4 subs as a bonus only...)

20240920_204902.jpg



The high-gloss beauty fronts will be added later, next week or the week after

By next week I shall finish cabling and mounting everything else then I will test the cabinet for airtightness and then measurements will follow
Have a nice weekend everybody!
 
And now let's see some measurements!

Note: these measurements were NOT taken in the final position of the speaker (in the living room next to the armchair) but in my home office upstairs where I have this sub already set up
I have just replaced that sub with the new one and took measurements in the main listening position (after res-measuring and re-setting the delay and gain values) + I also did a round of optimization with Dirac Live 3.10.3
Measurements in the final position downstairs with my main sub in the front integrated will follow probably next month only since I need to buy an amp first to drive this new sub there

Frequency response at MLP (approx. 75cm from the fronts and approx. 3 meters from the sub in the back) using 1/12 smoothing
Delay, gain, polarity set and crossover in place (linear phase, 24dB/oct. at 80Hz)

Blue is without Dirac Live, red is with Dirac Live - note the room mode related dips (not really audible in my opinion)
1727101477398.png


The same using Psy smoothing:

1727101567830.png



Distortion:

I would say even with Dirac this is pretty good

1727101655439.png



GD:

That peak between 80 and 90Hz is there with only the sub playing too so it is room related and not crossover related

1727101728032.png


Wavelet with Dirac:

I consider this to be fine for a system with a sub
1727101881904.png


Step response with Dirac:
Note the minor pre-echo due to the linear phase crossover - nothing to be worried about though

1727101964271.png


Subjectively speaking: it sounds wonderful!
Really, nothing to complain about; extreme fast and precise lows, as one should expect from a sealed cabinet
The difference I hear vs. the other sub I have here is that with this one the bass is less 'meaty' - it sounds less 'full' but it sounds 'faster' and more 'precise' - I am not really sure why but that's what I hear. I love both but this is closer to my taste when it comes to a sub.

Next step is that once I get the amp (Sabaj A30A) I will bring the speaker downstairs to its final location, perform the integration with the main sub and publish the measurements here
And of course the beauty fronts are yet to be done too

Final note: I was really delighted to use my new UMIK-2 microphone here! Making delay measurements was a walk in the park - I was done in literally a few minutes (performed 3 measurements and got the same delay value up to 2 millisec. decimals)
 
Hi, did you add some fabric over the sponges? I mean, the melamine foam is highly abrasive, so if there is even a remote chanse some of it ends up in the voice coil gap there is potential for disaster. This might be unnecessary concern, but a concern nevertheless so wanted to express :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: SCR
Hi, did you add some fabric over the sponges? I mean, the melamine foam is highly abrasive, so if there is even a remote chanse some of it ends up in the voice coil gap there is potential for disaster. This might be unnecessary concern, but a concern nevertheless so wanted to express :)
Thanks for raising this - actually I did not consider this risk to be high on the list. The sponges can't move in the cabinet since they are strained.
 
It took a bit longer than expected but final design is now there:

20241020_205044.jpg


20241020_205137.jpg


And the final location:

20241020_205715.jpg


Nexth month I will get the amp (Sabaj A30A) and will integrate the new sub into the existing setup (there is already a sub in the front; this is in the back, approx. 3 meters from the MLP)

I will of course post all the measurements
 
Happy to report that there is a spinoff to this project!
One of my friends will more or less replicate this idea, please see it here:
 
Just wanted to share this idea for bracing - I think it works really well (as far as the knock-knock test goes) but any comments are more than welcome

View attachment 393314

I think it is called a wire-strainer in English but apparently it has other functions too :)
It might be called a 'turn-buckle' if it is what I think it is> How do you have it attached to the cabinet, and what is the function? I take it to add stiffness?
 
It might be called a 'turn-buckle' if it is what I think it is> How do you have it attached to the cabinet, and what is the function? I take it to add stiffness?
It actually 'attaches' itself
As you keep turning it, it becomes longer so it strains itself into the cabinet, providing additional bracing/stiffness
The knock test shows the result really well
 
Finally I had some time to play around with integrating this sub with my front sub and with my main speakers (not the spheres but a pair of heavily modified Adam Audio T5V because those are my current experimental project)

I did volume matching then I measured all the delays and then I just applied a 24dB/octave linear phase symmetrical crossover at 80Hz

It did kind of a nice job, this is the measurement at the MLP with zero additional DSP correction:

Frequency response + Phase
1734423730609.png


GD
1734423774376.png


Step

1734423812203.png


Wavelet

1734423838708.png


In my opinion these graphs look pretty OK

Then I did a 9-point Dirac Live optimization (with some additional manual correction)

1734423912512.png


Actually I was quite happy with the looks of it!
(you can see all the other graphs in the attached mdat file for your scrutiny)

But then when listening to it it sounded muffled and 'out of place'....
I have managed to get a pretty good sound at the end of the day by applying different low shelf filters for each sub individually (different Q, freq and gain)

But I was not quite happy with it still.....

I have decided to take a plunge into playing around with minimum phase crossover settings
I have tried 18, 24, 36 and 48dB/octave settings. I saw that the 36dB symmetrical setting looked the best (actually nicer FR and phase vs. with linear phase but much uglier Step response and Wavelet)
Then I started combining slopes and found that combining a 24dB low-pass with a 36dB high-pass yielded the absolute best results!

Frequency response vs linear phase 24dB:

1734426514908.png


Phase
1734426567129.png


GD

1734426638722.png


Here the LP version looks nicer (naturally)

Wavelet also looks a bit worse with MP (again, naturally)

1734426767670.png

1734426799525.png


After applying Dirac and a few manual corrections this is what I got:

1734426870194.png


A little bit elevated GD but a lot of those huge peaks are gone

1734426992375.png


And the peak energy delay is kept under 20ms

1734427030256.png


Overall I am really happy now! It sounds more natural and you literally cannot tell that there is a sub (let alone two) in the room
Please see the mdat file here
 
Just a quick update:
I have found a better spot for the subs in the back - I was performing measurements at multiple positions and found out that this one yields the best response (there was not much of a difference in terms of frequency response, but huge differences in terms of the temporal graphs)

20250105_170053.jpg


I also have replaced my full range drivers with these coaxial drivers
For the time being in temporary test cabinets but next months I will move them to the sphere cabinets and will slightly redesign the stands too

1737279581348.png
 
Back
Top Bottom