RCA Interlinks: Influence of conductor material. MEASUREMENTS.

[IAtaman]

Again: THESE ARE NOT MY MEASUREMENTS.

The mention of the FT was to explain that sometimes other mathematics than the usual ones are needed, nothing more. Other example: It is like trying to explain the limit of the speed of light with Newtonian physics.

Whoever is not able to appreciate the enormous difference is that he has a problem in his audio system. The fact is incontestable, so the measurements of R, L, C do not serve, within reasonable values, to explain the difference in audio quality, it is what I say.

We need other type of measurements. Which?

I say this as compassionately as I can be, so please do take it that way : neither you nor the people you are quoting have no idea what you are talking about.

 

[wwenze]

It is obvious that the measurements of the impedance, L, R and C do not explain the big, huge difference in sound. This does not mean that they are not still very useful, but in this matter they are not.

Interestingly the measurements of the impedance L, R and C do explain the difference in waveforms measured. (And with a powerful enough simulator probably recreate that too) Therefore by logical induction those waveforms do not explain the big, huge difference in sound either.

 

[BDWoody]

It is obvious that the measurements of the impedance, L, R and C do not explain the big, huge difference in sound. This does not mean that they are not still very useful, but in this matter they are not.

Neither is this thread.

Whoever is not able to appreciate the enormous difference is that he has a problem in his audio system.

Ok then.