Those problems have been largely overcome. Don't get me wrong. I still use and like wired, but you are overstating the case against BT.
Have they? Large over-ear Bluetooth headphones have gotten better, but in-ears (the primary form factor for mobile users) are still lagging (pun intended) well behind wired, with the consumer having to choose between unreliable connectivity or looking like an idiot with antenna sticking out of your ears (*cough*AppleAirpods). And as I said, these Bluetooth IEMs do not have long enough battery life to get you through a long-haul flight, a big inconvenience for many people, and their batteries will be even further degraded after a couple of years usage.
And then there's the downgrade in audio fidelity. Sony's LDAC, supposedly a 'hi-res Bluetooth codec', is nowhere near even 16-bit CD-quality at its highest bitrate:
The majority of devices don't even achieve this bitrate however due to Bluetooth's poor connection strength when e.g. you phone's in your pocket (a very common occurrence). This is what a lot of devices default to, and others often fall back to when connection strength invariably decreases:
And those graphs are for hi-res sources - the results for CD-quality sources would be even worse. Even Sony's own top of the line Bluetooth IEMs, the WH1000XM3, only achieve around -60dBm connection strength in real-world usage, which either results in dropped audio (skipping), or falling back to the lowest bitrate setting. And this is the best that Bluetooth has to offer. It's an utter mess. None of the issues I've mentioned exist with wired headphones. If you care at all about sound quality, you will stay well clear of Bluetooth until the technology matures (if that ever happens).