Just FYI, the original Heil-designed AMTs were much bigger. ESS (Electrostatic Sound) was the company that released them in the 70s:I'm a big fan of Heil AMT's...
Just FYI, the original Heil-designed AMTs were much bigger. ESS (Electrostatic Sound) was the company that released them in the 70s:
I know , I have a pair of ESS speakers ;-)
No words for my jealousy.
There's no sonic difference I can detect. I'm planning to shift to a 3-way speaker, likely the Neumann KH 310 A. I'd try the HEDD monitors of course, but the dealers are few and far between. Having a reliable outboard DAC takes some of reconfig work out of the equation.I'm jealous of your ADAM S2V's - so we're even
You prefer to feed it the analogue output of your DAC3? Prefer this to feeding it AES3 digital?
I guess DAC3 gives you a physical volume control (or remote control) which is important.
I recall, I guess it was 1974 or thereabouts, my first impression of the AMT 1. In fact, it was my only time listening to them, as they were pretty rare beasts, in the scheme of things--at least in my parts. It was at an audio show, so you can't place that much validity on the sound as it might relate to a typical listening room. In any case, what I distinctly remember were highs sizzling forth rapidly, while waiting for the bass and lower mid range to catch up. I don't know... it was just kind of an odd sonic thing. A Quad (original) was available to compare, and except for the obvious differences in SPL, the latter came off as much more coherent, overall. I know that ESS came up with some sort of AMT woofer device, but I never heard that system. I never read much positive about it. How much air can an air motion transformer be expected to move?I'm a big fan of Heil AMT's... always wanted to have a pair strapped to my head.
I recall, I guess it was 1974 or thereabouts, my first impression of the AMT 1. In fact, it was my only time listening to them, as they were pretty rare beasts, in the scheme of things--at least in my parts. It was at an audio show, so you can't place that much validity on the sound as it might relate to a typical listening room. In any case, what I distinctly remember were highs sizzling forth rapidly, while waiting for the bass and lower mid range to catch up. I don't know... it was just kind of an odd sonic thing. A Quad (original) was available to compare, and except for the obvious differences in SPL, the latter came off as much more coherent, overall. I know that ESS came up with some sort of AMT woofer device, but I never heard that system. I never read much positive about it. How much air can an air motion transformer be expected to move?
How much air can an air motion transformer be expected to move?
LOL. For bass? And all (or most of) it at the same time? I guess even Dr. Heil couldn't do that. But I had it wrong. It was evidently a series of cone drivers. From The Audio Critic 1977:At the least, all of it in the listening room, would be my guess.
As I said, the AMT1 I heard was at an audio show in the mid '70s. Given the vagaries of audio show politics, and the 'high end' of the era, the company could well have had the treble turned to 10, and the bass way down. That would not really have been surprising; possibly in order for them to make an impression about their tweeter. And it did make an impression. No doubbt about that. I don't remember if they were using their own electronics. The company used to make a beefy amp and, I think, a preamp. In any case, the original AMT1 is history, and so are the Quads demoed in the next booth. FWIW, I bought the Quads. Sold them, and now wish I hadn't.Hi, I have the ESS Fortura towers. There's nothing at all sizzling in the top end.
As I said, the AMT1 I heard was at an audio show in the mid '70s. Given the vagaries of audio show politics, and the 'high end' of the era, the company could well have had the treble turned to 10, and the bass way down. That would not really have been surprising; possibly in order for them to make an impression about their tweeter. And it did make an impression. No doubbt about that. I don't remember if they were using their own electronics. The company used to make a beefy amp and, I think, a preamp. In any case, the original AMT1 is history, and so are the Quads demoed in the next booth. FWIW, I bought the Quads. Sold them, and now wish I hadn't.