- Thread Starter
- #141
I never knew the was was German.
I never knew the was was German.
Probably he may. We don’t know. To me, it sounded way better in every aspects. Sounded very much spacious, smooth and detailed. Kef as usual sounded like the the megaphone, but with meta the effect is reduced but still not gone completely. But Kef is a great speaker to refer to, for me that appreciate German companies more.Let's hope somebody sends some Cantons to him soon so he can really understand what good sound actually is.
He isn't, just my YT settings are in German language.I never knew the was was German.
Am sure he would enjoy some good Cantons, now what someone likes better depends on many personal and individual factors.Let's hope somebody sends some Cantons to him soon so he can really understand what good sound actually is.
True, to me they are definitely comparable speakers in terms of sound quality. They both sound good in different ways. I would like to see how the new references measure. To my ears, the cantons sounded better in terms of bass control, midrange transparency and treble extension than my reference 3 any day. Definitely an easy upgrade. I am not judging by materials here, but I think the ceramic coated tweeters on the cantons are way more natural than the sharp kefsHe isn't, just my YT settings are in German language.
Am sure he would enjoy some good Cantons, now what someone likes better depends on many personal and individual factors.
Looking forward to seeing the review!KEF lent him a pair. They must have felt really bad after he had to buy and sell with a loss a pair of LS60 for review... And we all know a good review is coming for the Blades, so it was the right thing to do.
Where did he poste this?
On his YouTube channel, under the Community part, he posts polls and updates and trivia.Where did he poste this?
Looking forward to seeing the review!On his YouTube channel, under the Community part, he posts polls and updates and trivia.
It will be interesting If Erin also experience the slight lack of very deep bass between 20-30 Hz that I experienced with the Kef blade 2 . This speaker seams to be slightly undertuned, so the deep bass might be more prominent with another placement of the speakers.
You have a blade 2 ? Wow!It will be interesting If Erin also experience the slight lack of very deep bass between 20-30 Hz that I experienced with the Kef blade 2 . This speaker seams to be slightly undertuned, so the deep bass might be more prominent with another placement of the speakers.
Otherwise a rather perfect sounding loudspeaker in my opinion. And beautiful.
No, but I have listened to themYou have a blade 2 ? Wow!
Well not quite the same as it depends on the room, the placement, the electronics the recordings, and as some others “Audiophiles” would say the cables, power cord, state of mind, the humidity level, the temperature, the time of day, the season, the light and smells in the room!No, but I have listened to them
Ah, then it must be the roomNo, but I have listened to them
I am sure you know it but for other readers I would like to add though that generally a single curve like the PIR isn't by far enough to say that 2 loudspeakers are very similar as they can have for example different directivities and still be tuned to a very similar PIR (in this case they are quite similar but still not the same):And I have posted elsewhere but to repeat here, it is amazing how my Sointuva AWG measures close to the Blade 2 Meta, considering the price and size difference.
A good example where the PIR are very similar but the directivities are quite different in the mids so to get to this result you tuned the direct sound differently.
Slight directivity mismatch on the mids and massive bass output difference, but other than that, yes, also quite similar.