I don't know, I think we are pretty dangerous to them. Someone's knocking at your door? Don't ask questions, just open fire:i think the idea is that if youre an alien who has managed to cobble togther a ship that can get here from Proxima Centauri then you had little to fear from a race who cant even get to the mars...
"We'd better get back, 'cause it'll be dark soon, and they mostly come at night... mostly."strange when how mostly making money on aliens mostly when shouldn't they be free ? seems odd to me , kinder like alien slavery selling it all for greedy amounts of capitalising money , for which ,
View attachment 318936
Not necessarily. Von Neumann probes:-If a species can travel lightyears then they must have the technology to travel faster than light. If they have the technology to travel faster than light then they must have the technology to be undetectable by humans. To claim UAP sightings are super advanced alien technology doesn’t make sense to me.
It has been theorized[3] that a self-replicating starship utilizing relatively conventional theoretical methods of interstellar travel (i.e., no exotic faster-than-light propulsion, and speeds limited to an "average cruising speed" of 0.1c.) could spread throughout a galaxy the size of the Milky Way in as little as half a million years
Why does that follow?If a species can travel lightyears then they must have the technology to travel faster than light. If they have the technology to travel faster than light then they must have the technology to be undetectable by humans
Or they could just be incredibly long lived/slow living.Not necessarily. Von Neumann probes:-
Or an audiophile favorite: cryogenic treatmentOr they could just be incredibly long lived/slow living.
Common sense. Developing FTL technology is such an incredible advancement that detection avoidance would be relatively easy.Why does that follow?
Says who? Maybe it’s the other way around…Common sense. Developing FTL technology is such an incredible advancement that detection avoidance would be relatively easy.
which begs the question, how on earth would we see FTL travel. What would it look like arm chair physicists.
I would think that detection avoidance would be (heh-heh-heh) unavoidable for something "moving faster than the speed of light".Common sense. Developing FTL technology is such an incredible advancement that detection avoidance would be relatively easy.
If so, I bet it will be the greatest bit of vapoware he ever promised, time until completion: infinityIs "FTL technology" actually a thing? Has Musk started a company yet?
^^I am familiar but this is very theoretical. Becuase it is theoretical, does not mean it is possible…
Do you have any physicists who have some respectability working on this as an actual thing? I think I will see what Sean Carroll says on his next AMA.
“As Farnes' theory allows a positive mass (i.e. a ship) to reach a speed equal to the speed of light, it has been dubbed "controversial".[17] If the theory is correct, which has been highly debated in the scientific literature, it would explain dark energy, dark matter, allow closed timelike curves (see time travel), and suggest that an Alcubierre drive is physically possible with exotic matter.[18]”
P.S. i would love for this stuff to be true, but being a good Bayesian, I am expressing my doubts…
But you are assuming FTL is necessaary. As has been pointed out - it isn't. Many planets in the milky way far older than ours, giving enough time to develop intelligent life, and explore the galaxy at sub light speed.Common sense. Developing FTL technology is such an incredible advancement that detection avoidance would be relatively easy.