What do you think of the 17x13x3.5 case with two 1200a100 and two 1et9040ba? ... with speakon. Dual mono in one chassis. Any cost advantage to this? And would that bring speakon to the 1et9040ba? I don't know how the buffer situation works on these, and in that scenario.
Not sure of such a case. Again, it comes down to minimum order quantity to make cases economical for me and the consumer.
No plans.No integration planned for Sylph Audio and 3E Audio modules like Audiophonics?
Any reasons ?
Would be disadvantageous expanding into that area of Class D for our company at this time. Would rather keep focusing on our Hypex/Purifi offerings and the Integrated.
Looking forward to seeing the integrated, can you provide some specs?
Very soon
Seems like the wrong thread for this, mistake?
Dylan said in a YouTube interview on BA at the end of last year that he was building a new theatre room to be a demo room for his products for customers. And that he was switching to the Storm processor that will feed all these new amps to demo. So I assume that would be new for 2024.
Technically new for 2024 but not pertinent for the purpose of this thread regarding products (no harm no foul).
If you are in fact willing to demo to customers, I may be curious enough to drive across the border at some point this year and maybe I could hear a ncx vs 9040 vs 7040. I'm curious about the highs on the slightly older amps vs the new 9040, that if I recall correctly you could see on a graph the rising distortion above 10kHz. Or maybe some event for many listeners is more effective with your time. Just Bruno is claiming on the 9040 that the "grit" on the highs has been solved, due to a better understanding of the output filter. Like what does that mean and can you hear a difference. It would be great to just get a 3 channel NCX, but is the 9040 better.
Link please
