Normal that it sounds bad when raising that valley of 115 Hz with + 11 dB.
Equalizing is not raising or lowering a specific frequency, but you don't have to be afraid to get down to it.
You will see that looking for information is very easy.
For now, I advise you not to raise the valleys you may...
My suggestion is to do more APO targets and see which EQ you like best.
I suggest you do a test by taking the 85 dB reference and equalizing it down.
Try this EQ up to 3 kHz for now, measure again with APO and do another EQ on the result
Take the test. You will see that the Individual...
Can you put the REW .mdat file without vs acoustic treatment?
10 cm thick panels is inappropriate
to control the lower and higher frequencies in the locations they are placed.
Besides, the resistivity to the flow of the air passage in its panels is very high.
It is not the most recommended...
Thank you for the courtesy in responding.
About the IR and FIR filters I don't want to disagree in this thread, I can simply say that I have done 2 equalizations:
The EQ in each channel with graphic filters has from 100 to 120 filters and the one made with parametrics in my case only has 12...
I already have it clear, thanks. What surprises me is that you say that with parametric filters you do not get such a precise and good sound.
Do the PEQs that your program applies in the mid-high zone have a fairly narrow Q?
I use PEQS and I never use a narrow Q in mid-high.
I hope you...
So, as you can see in the capture that I have posted of the equalization, are they only graphic filters or are there also mixed parametric ones?
I see that it says for example:
GraphicEQ and hence my confusion:
I give an example of the first filter of the Channel L
Thanks for putting the 2 links.
I use the Pc + Equalizer APO ( REW + Umik-1) for my 5.1
I have followed the steps of this video and I have already been able to with the Bose Companion II.
What I see is that the equalizer is graphic and not parametric.
Can they be done with...